Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure showed only a modest correlation with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r = 0.302; p < 0.01) when omitting PEEP, making it a poor predictor of preload.
Observational
Does pulmonary capillary wedge pressure predict left ventricular preload in critically ill patients with sepsis and cardiac disease?
Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure is a poor predictor of left ventricular preload in critically ill patients, likely due to abnormalities in left ventricular compliance.
Effect estimate: r = 0.302
p-value: p=<0.01
The construction of a Frank-Starling myocardial function curve relating heart work to left ventricular preload is clinically utilized to assess therapeutic protocols in critically ill patients. The pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PWP) is the index of left ventricular filling pressure most frequently utilized as representative of left ventricular preload. The authors assessed the relationship between left ventricular preload measured as the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and the PWP, in acutely ill patients with sepsis and cardiac disease. Within each group, no relationship was found between the LVEDV and the PWP; however, when omitting the effect of PEEP, a modest correlation was noted (r = 0.302; p less than 0.01). Of the left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDV and PWP, the PWP accounted for less than 5% of the explained variance in the stroke volume index. The PWP is a poor predictor of left ventricular preload, probably because of abnormalities of left ventricular compliance in critically ill patients.
Calvin et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Sepsis and cardiac disease in critically ill patients. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PWP) was evaluated on Relationship between left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and PWP (r = 0.302, p=<0.01). Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure showed only a modest correlation with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r = 0.302; p < 0.01) when omitting PEEP, making it a poor predictor of preload.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: