Key result
Hemodynamic preload indexes correlate poorly with echocardiographic LV cavity area during cardiac surgery.
Why the study?
Hemodynamic indexes such as PADP, PAWP, and LVEDP are commonly used to estimate LV preload, but their reliability to reflect anatomical LV volume during cardiac surgery is uncertain.
Do hemodynamic indexes of preload (PADP, PAWP, LVEDP) accurately estimate anatomical preload (LV volume) during cardiac surgery?
Population
45 patients undergoing coronary or aortic valve surgery
Design
Observational study
Authors
Loading...
Hemodynamic preload indexes should not guide intraoperative LV volume assessment; supports validation against imaging in future perioperative studies.
Observational (n=45)
Do hemodynamic indexes of preload (PADP, PAWP, LVEDP) accurately estimate anatomical preload (LV volume) during cardiac surgery?
Effect estimate: r = 0.34
p-value: p=<0.03
Hemodynamic indexes of preload (PADP, PAWP) are poor guides to LVEDP and do not reliably reflect changes in LV size during cardiac surgery.
Douglas et al. (1987) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing coronary or aortic valve procedure (n=45). Hemodynamic indexes of preload (PADP, PAWP, LVEDP) vs. Epicardial two-dimensional echocardiographic LV cavity area was evaluated on Correlation between hemodynamic indexes and LV cavity area (r = 0.34, p=<0.03). Hemodynamic indexes of preload correlated poorly with echocardiographic left ventricular cavity area during cardiac surgery (r=0.34, p<0.03 for PADP; no correlation for PAWP or LVEDP).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: