Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition that is both a sentinel health event and significant public health issue. However, significant gaps exist in our understanding of adult patient outcomes following CSDH. This study synthesized the evidence regarding patient outcomes using a comprehensive theoretical model with gap-mapping to support the development of patient-informed healthcare pathways. A rapid systematic review examined two databases (MEDLINE, PsycInfo) and English language publications from 2002 to 2023 for adult patient outcomes following CSDH. Results were analyzed using narrative synthesis and gap-mapping against a six-domain positive health model incorporating bodily functions, daily functioning, mental health, quality of life, meaning and participation. Fifty-six studies, comprising 76,186 CSDH cases, were included. Most studies were rated as having low methodological quality, with the majority focusing on bodily functions, using clinician-rated measures, and examining the first six months post-CSDH. Clinician-rated outcomes of global physical disability indicated good recovery in the majority of patients (50%-98%), and moderate/moderately severe disability in 20% in the first six months. Although there was a paucity of research regarding other health domains and very limited use of patient-reported measures, these studies indicated longer-term problems, including physical disability, poorer mental health and cognitive dysfunction. CSDH is a prevalent neurosurgical condition with limited evidence for patient outcomes beyond clinician-rated outcomes of global physical disability in the acute phase. The underutilization of patient-reported outcomes and evidence-based models in research examining CSDH has seriously limited both our understanding of patient outcomes and innovations in healthcare for this vulnerable group.
Hennessy et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: