Key result
Passaging FMDV in the presence of sub-neutralizing levels of soluble secreted αvβ6 resulted in the rapid selection of genetically stable viral mutants with altered receptor tropism and capsid mutations.
FMDV rapidly develops resistance to soluble receptor prophylactic measures in vitro via distinct capsid mutations that expand receptor tropism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rapid mutant selection cautions against soluble integrin prophylactics for FMDV; leaves open in vivo fitness and field relevance.
BACKGROUND: Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) initiates infection via recognition of one of at least four cell-surface integrin molecules αvβ1, αvβ3, αvβ6, or αvβ8 by a highly conserved Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) amino acid sequence motif located in the G-H loop of VP1. Within the animal host, the αvβ6 interaction is believed to be the most relevant. Sub-neutralizing levels of soluble secreted αvβ6 (ssαvβ6) was used as a selective pressure during passages in vitro to explore the plasticity of that interaction. RESULTS: Genetically stable soluble integrin resistant (SIR) FMDV mutants derived from A24 Cruzeiro were selected after just 3 passages in cell culture in the presence of sub-neutralizing levels of ssαvβ6. SIR mutants were characterized by: replication on selective cell lines, plaque morphology, relative sensitivity to ssαvβ6 neutralization, relative ability to utilize αvβ6 for infection, as well as sequence and structural changes. All SIR mutants maintained an affinity for αvβ6. Some developed the ability to attach to cells expressing heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycan, while others appear to have developed affinity for a still unknown third receptor. Two classes of SIR mutants were selected that were highly or moderately resistant to neutralization by ssαvβ6. Highly resistant mutants displayed a G145D substitution (RGD to RDD), while moderately resistant viruses exhibited a L150P/R substitution at the conserved RGD + 4 position. VP1 G-H loop homology models for the A-type SIR mutants illustrated potential structural changes within the integrin-binding motif by these 2 groups of mutations. Treatment of O1 Campos with ssαvβ6 resulted in 3 SIR mutants with a positively charged VP3 mutation allowing for HS binding. CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate how FMDV particles rapidly gain resistance to soluble receptor prophylactic measures in vitro. Two different serotypes developed distinct capsid mutations to circumvent the presence of sub-neutralizing levels of the soluble cognate receptor, all of which resulted in a modified receptor tropism that expanded the cell types susceptible to FMDV. The identification of some of these adaptive mutations in known FMDV isolates suggests these findings have implications beyond the cell culture system explored in these studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawrence et al. (2013) studied Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) infection. Sub-neutralizing levels of soluble secreted αvβ6 (ssαvβ6) vs. Wild-type FMDV without ssαvβ6 selective pressure was evaluated on Generation of soluble integrin resistant (SIR) FMDV mutants. Passaging FMDV in the presence of sub-neutralizing levels of soluble secreted αvβ6 resulted in the rapid selection of genetically stable viral mutants with altered receptor tropism and capsid mutations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: