Key result
In rats with MI-induced LV dysfunction, combining zofenopril with dietary sodium restriction significantly reduced LV ACE activity and inhibited LV hypertrophy compared to zofenopril alone.
Why the study?
Does dietary sodium restriction combined with zofenopril reduce LV ACE activity and hypertrophy in rats with MI-induced LV dysfunction?
Does dietary sodium restriction combined with zofenopril reduce LV ACE activity and hypertrophy in rats with MI-induced LV dysfunction?
Dietary sodium restriction potentiates the tissue-specific effects of zofenopril on left ventricular ACE activity and hypertrophy in a rat model of MI-induced LV dysfunction.
Hypothesis-generating in rat MI model; leaves open whether sodium restriction augments ACE-I effects in patients.
INTRODUCTION: In patients with myocardial infarction (MI)-induced heart failure, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are proven effective therapy in inhibiting the progression towards overt heart failure. However, the prognosis in these patients is still very poor, and optimisation of therapy is warranted. The antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of ACE inhibitors (ACE-Is) can be substantially enhanced by dietary sodium restriction. In line with the latter, the aim of the present study was to explore whether dietary sodium restriction enhances the efficacy of ACE-I after MI. METHODS: Rats with MI-induced left ventricular (LV) dysfunction received ACE-I therapy with zofenopril (5.5 mg/kg/day orally), with or without dietary sodium restriction. ACE activity was measured in non-infarcted LV tissue, kidneys and plasma. Effects on cardiac hypertrophy were examined by means of organ weight/body weight ratios. After blood pressure (BP) measurements, functional consequences of therapy were evaluated as LV pressure development in isolated perfused hearts. RESULTS: Dietary sodium restriction alone had no effect on any of the measured parameters, whereas zofenopril alone significantly reduced plasma and kidney ACE activity, but not LV ACE activity, nor LV weight/body weight ratio. However, only when ACE-I therapy was combined with dietary sodium restriction was LV ACE activity significantly reduced. This effect was paralleled by inhibition of LV hypertrophy. BP was reduced after infarction, and further reduced by zofenopril, but not affected by dietary sodium. Neither treatment was associated with effects on the MI-induced reduction of LV function in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Effects of ACE inhibition with zofenopril can be potentiated by additional dietary sodium restriction. However, these effects were tissue-specific, since LV, but not kidney or plasma, ACE activity was affected by the additional dietary sodium restriction. Effects on LV ACE activity were paralleled by reduced LV hypertrophy. Since the measured parameters did not indicate any adverse side-effects, dietary sodium restriction may provide a safe strategy to improve ACE-I efficacy in patients with infarction-induced LV dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westendorp et al. (2004) studied Myocardial infarction-induced left ventricular dysfunction. Zofenopril combined with dietary sodium restriction vs. Zofenopril alone or dietary sodium restriction alone was evaluated on Left ventricular ACE activity and left ventricular hypertrophy. In rats with MI-induced LV dysfunction, combining zofenopril with dietary sodium restriction significantly reduced LV ACE activity and inhibited LV hypertrophy compared to zofenopril alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: