Why the study?
Does eGFR-adjusted high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T accurately diagnose acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with chest pain and renal insufficiency?
Does eGFR-adjusted high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T accurately diagnose acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with chest pain and renal insufficiency?
Higher hs-cTnT cut-off values, stratified by eGFR, are necessary for the accurate diagnosis of AMI in patients with renal insufficiency.
eGFR-stratified hs-cTnT thresholds may aid AMI diagnosis in renal impairment; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with renal insufficiency, since this population has a high incidence of non-AMI elevations of hs-cTnT. METHODS: In this prospective study, we enrolled 2249 consecutive patients presenting with chest pain in the emergency department (ED), of whom 19.5% had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)cys of <60 mL·min-1 (1.73 m2)-1. Hs-cTnT levels were measured blindly at presentation. RESULTS: Of the patients, 1108 (49.3%) were diagnosed as having AMI [321 with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)]. In patients whose final diagnosis was not AMI, there was a low but significant correlation between hs-cTnT and renal function [eGFRcys, r=-0.43 (-0.48, -0.38), p<0.001; eGFRcreat, r=-0.33 (-0.38, -0.27), p<0.001]. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) for hs-cTnT to diagnose AMI was 0.93 in patients with eGFRcys levels of <30 mL·min-1 (1.73 m2)-1, and AUCs did not vary significantly according to eGFR categories. On the basis of the ROC curve, the optimal threshold value for hs-cTnT was 143.6 ng·L-1 to diagnose AMI in patients with eGFRcys of <30 mL·min-1 (1.73 m2)-1, with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 91%; 54.1 ng·L-1 in patients with eGFRcys between 30 and 59 mL·min-1, with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 87%; 30.0 ng·L-1 in patients with eGFRcys between 60 and 89 mL·min-1, with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 85%; and 20.3 ng·L-1 in patients with eGFRcys ≥90 mL·min-1 (1.73 m2)-1, with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 88%. The same observations were done for the diagnosis of NSTEMI. CONCLUSIONS: Using a higher hs-cTnT cut-off value based on eGFR level is necessary for accurate diagnosis of AMI or NSTEMI in patients with renal insufficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: