Key result
Tracking the 3-hour relative change in hs-cTnT levels provided high diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction in hemodialysis patients (AUC 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.96; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does tracking the dynamic change in hs-cTnT levels improve the diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction in hemodialysis patients presenting with chest pain or dyspnea?
Observational (n=670)
Does tracking the dynamic change in hs-cTnT levels improve the diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction in hemodialysis patients presenting with chest pain or dyspnea?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.96)
p-value: p=< .001
Tracking the dynamic change in hs-cTnT levels over 3 hours significantly improves diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction in hemodialysis patients, overcoming the limitation that 97% of these patients have chronically elevated baseline levels.
May aid AMI diagnosis in hemodialysis despite chronic hs-cTnT elevation; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective validation before practice change.
CONTEXT: Cardiac troponins have become the gold standard for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the general population; however, their diagnostic accuracy for hemodialysis (HD) patients presenting with chest pain or dyspnea is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To examine the diagnostic accuracy of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay for AMI in HD patients. DESIGN: In this prospective study, we enrolled 670 consecutive stable HD patients presenting with chest pain or dyspnea on routine predialysis therapy in the nephrology department. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTnT levels at enrollment in HD patients presenting with chest pain or dyspnea, and the dynamic change in these levels after 3 hours. RESULTS: Acute myocardial infarction was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 12% of HD patients. Among patients with a final diagnosis other than AMI, 97% had a plasma hs-cTnT concentration above the 99th percentile. At the time of enrollment, the area under the ROC curve of hs-cTnT levels for diagnosis of AMI was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.74; P < .001) with a cutoff value of 107.7 ng/L; the relative change after 3 hours was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.96, P < .001) with a cutoff value of 24%, and the absolute change was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82-0.94, P < .001) with a cutoff value of 32.6 ng/L. The prognostic value for 40-day mortality varied with the magnitude of elevation in hs-cTnT levels. CONCLUSIONS: Tracking the dynamic change in hs-cTnT levels during the short term significantly increased this measure's diagnostic accuracy for AMI in HD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Hemodialysis patients presenting with chest pain or dyspnea (n=670). Dynamic change in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels vs. Baseline hs-cTnT levels was evaluated on Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AUC 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.96, p=< .001). Tracking the 3-hour relative change in hs-cTnT levels provided high diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction in hemodialysis patients (AUC 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.96; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: