Key result
Troponin diagnostic performance for AMI worsens with declining eGFR.
Why the study?
Interpreting an elevated first troponin in patients with impaired renal function presents a major diagnostic challenge in acute myocardial infarction.
Do eGFR-specific troponin cut-offs improve the diagnostic performance for acute myocardial infarction in patients with renal impairment compared to conventional unadjusted cut-offs?
Observational (n=221,175)
Yes
Do eGFR-specific troponin cut-offs improve the diagnostic performance for acute myocardial infarction in patients with renal impairment compared to conventional unadjusted cut-offs?
The diagnostic performance of unadjusted troponin cut-offs for AMI decreases with worsening renal function, suggesting eGFR-specific cut-offs could improve triage and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
eGFR-specific troponin cut-offs may improve AMI diagnosis in CKD; leaves open prospective validation versus unadjusted thresholds.
Background Serum troponin measurement forms a cornerstone of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) diagnosis. A major challenge is interpretation of an elevated first troponin in patients with impaired renal function. We aimed to (1) evaluate the relationship between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and first troponin, (2) characterise the performance of different troponin assays for diagnosing AMI and (3) derive eGFR-specific thresholds for potential clinical use. Methods We analysed the distribution of troponin values stratified by eGFR and AMI. Diagnostic performance was analysed using the C-statistic. Test detection rate, false positive rate and positive predictive value were calculated for different cut-offs. Results We included 221 175 patients between 2010 and 2017 from four acute tertiary care hospitals in London, UK, with a median age of 65 years (IQR 49–79). eGFR was<60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in 20.6% of patients and 6.4% of patients had a diagnosis of AMI. In patients without AMI, we observed an inverse log-linear relationship between eGFR and troponin. Diagnostic performance for AMI was best in patients with eGFR>90 (C-statistic 0.93) and worst in eGFR<15 (C-statistic 0.81). For high-sensitive troponin T, using the conventional cut-off of 14 ng/L, false positive rates ranged from 68–93% for eGFRs between 15 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Restricting the false positive rate to 15% yields eGFR specific cut-offs of 73, 112 and 184 ng/L, with detection rates of 73%, 70% and 68% in patients with an eGFR of 45–60, 30–45 or 15–30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Conclusions The diagnostic performance of an unadjusted troponin cut-off for AMI falls with worsening renal function. We propose consideration of eGFR specific cut-offs to support more effective triage and early management of suspected AMI in patients with renal impairment. Trial registration number NCT03507309 .
Collard et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction in renal impairment (n=221,175). Renal impairment (eGFR) vs. Normal renal function (eGFR > 90) was evaluated on Diagnostic performance for AMI (C-statistic). The diagnostic performance of troponin for acute myocardial infarction worsens with declining renal function, dropping from a C-statistic of 0.93 in eGFR>90 to 0.81 in eGFR<15.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: