Key result
5-HT produced significantly larger contractions in canine vein grafts compared to control veins, likely due to increased responsiveness of the 5-HT1 receptor.
Canine vein grafts exhibit increased contraction to 5-HT, likely due to increased 5-HT1 receptor responsiveness caused by grafting into the arterial circulation.
Hypothesis-generating for 5-HT1 hyperreactivity in arterialized veins; human studies needed before clinical relevance.
Background The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of vasoconstrictor substances such as 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and endothelin on the smooth muscle of canine femoral veins and vein grafts. Methods The right canine femoral vein was grafted into the right femoral artery. The left femoral vein was used as a control. In other experiments to examine the effects of surgical procedures such as dissection of the adventitia and the effects of grafting (vein-to-vein bypass), the right femoral vein was dissected out but not removed for grafting and an autogenous vein bypass of the right femoral vein was made using the left femoral vein. In all experiments, the veins were removed 4 weeks after operation and suspended in organ chambers for isometric tension recording. Results Maximum contractions to endothelin were comparable in control vein and vein grafts. In control vein, the maximum contraction to 5-HT was small, and was inhibited by both methiothepin, a 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 antagonist, and sarpogrelate hydrochloride, a 5-HT2 antagonist. In vein grafts 5-HT produced significantly larger contractions than in control veins, which were inhibited by methiothepin but not by the 5-HT2 antagonist. In veins with adventitial dissection alone and vein-to-vein grafts, 5-HT produced small contractions which were comparable to those in control vein. Conclusion The larger contraction response to 5-HT in canine vein grafts may be due to an increased responsiveness of the 5-HT1 receptor caused by grafting into the arterial circulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mawatari et al. (1997) studied Vein grafts. 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and endothelin vs. Control vein (left femoral vein) was evaluated on Maximum contractions to endothelin and 5-HT. 5-HT produced significantly larger contractions in canine vein grafts compared to control veins, likely due to increased responsiveness of the 5-HT1 receptor.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: