Why the study?
Rapid progression of coronary non-target lesions is essential for future cardiovascular events, but clinical predictors of this progression and revascularization needed investigation.
What are the clinical predictors of rapid progression and revascularization of coronary non-target lesions in patients undergoing serial coronary angiography?
What are the clinical predictors of rapid progression and revascularization of coronary non-target lesions in patients undergoing serial coronary angiography?
STEMI, higher HbA1c, higher triglycerides, and complex lesion morphology (B2/C) are significant predictors of rapid progression and subsequent revascularization of non-target coronary lesions.
May warrant closer surveillance in STEMI or complex-lesion patients; leaves open whether targeting predictors alters progression.
Rapid progression of coronary no-target lesions is essential for the induction of future cardiovascular events. We aimed to investigate clinical predictors of rapid progression and revascularization of coronary non-target lesions. Consecutive patients who underwent two serial coronary angiographies were included. All coronary non-target lesions were recorded and evaluated at both procedures. A total of 1255 patients and 1670 lesions were included. At the patient level, 239 (19%) had rapid progression and 186 (14.8%) underwent revascularization. The incidence of lesion revascularization and myocardial infarction was significantly higher in patients with rapid progression. In multivariable analyses, hypertension (hazards ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.00; P = 0.049), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (HR, 1.46; 95%CI, 1.03-2.07; P = 0.035), glycosylated hemoglobin (HR, 1.16; 95%CI, 1.01-1.33; P = 0.039) and lesion classification (B2/C versus A/B1) (HR, 1.73; 95%CI, 1.27-2.35; P = 0.001) were significant factors associated with rapid progression. The level of triglyceride (HR, 1.10; 95%CI, 1.00-1.20; P = 0.040) and lesion classification (B2/C versus A/B1) (HR, 1.53; 95%CI, 1.09-2.14; P = 0.014) were predictors of lesion revascularization. Clinicians should pay more attention to patients with these factors to prevent future cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: