Why the study?
Does the implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist improve outcomes and reduce morbidity in patients undergoing non-cardiac, non-obstetric surgeries?
Does the implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist improve outcomes and reduce morbidity in patients undergoing non-cardiac, non-obstetric surgeries?
Implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist significantly reduces postoperative wound infections and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing general surgery.
Checklist implementation was associated with fewer infections and shorter stays; leaves open whether RCTs would confirm benefits before practice change.
Background: Surgery is an essential part of health care. Adverse events can occur in surgical care but more than half of these are avoidable. A number of checklists have been developed to reduce these adverse events; the WHO surgical safety checklist has shown better outcome improvements than previous checklists. This study was designed to apply WHO surgical safety checklist in operation theaters of a tertiary care hospital to measure baseline surgical safety protocols and outcome measurements. Methodology: This was a prospective interventional study conducted in three phases. First phase was base line data collection, implementation of surgical safety checklist during second phase and post-implementation data collection in last phase. A total of 613 patients were included, consisting of 303 during pre-implementation and 310 in post-implementation. Duration of each phase was 3 months. Primary end points were discharge from hospital, 25 days or death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toor et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: