Why the study?
Smart home systems could enhance chronic heart failure clinical and self-management, but evidence to guide system functionalities is lacking.
A multidisciplinary panel of healthcare professionals reached consensus on 34 core functions for a smart home system to support self-management in patients with chronic heart failure.
Guides smart home system design for HF self-care; extends expert consensus to standardize digital health functions.
Background: Smart home systems could enhance clinical and self-management of chronic heart failure by supporting health monitoring and remote support, but evidence to guide the design of smart home system functionalities is lacking. Objective: To identify consensus-based recommendations for functions of a smart home system that could augment clinical and self-management for people living with chronic heart failure in the community. Methods: Healthcare professionals caring for people living with chronic heart failure participated in a two-round modified Delphi survey and a consensus workshop. Thirty survey items spanning eight chronic health failure categories were derived from international guidelines for the management of heart failure. In survey Round 1, participants rated the importance of all items using a 9-point Liket scale and suggested new functions to support people with chronic heart failure in their homes using a smart home system. The Likert scale scores ranged from 0 (not important) to 9 (very important) and scores were categorized into three groups: 1-3 = not important, 4-6 = important, and 7-9 = very important. Consensus agreement was defined a priori as ≥70% of respondents rating a score of ≥7 and ≤ 15% rating a score ≤ 3. In survey Round 2, panel members re-rated items where consensus was not reached, and rated the new items proposed in earlier round. Panel members were invited to an online consensus workshop to discuss items that had not reached consensus after Round 2 and agree on a set of recommendations for a smart home system. Results: In Round 1, 15 experts agreed 24/30 items were "very important", and suggested six new items. In Round 2, experts agreed 2/6 original items and 6/6 new items were "very important". During the consensus workshop, experts endorsed 2/4 remaining items. Finally, the expert panel recommended 34 items as "very important" for a smart home system including, healthy eating, body weight and fluid intake, physical activity and sedentary behavior, heart failure symptoms, tobacco cessation and alcohol reduction, medication adherence, physiological monitoring, interaction with healthcare professionals, and mental health among others. Conclusion: A panel of healthcare professional experts recommended 34-item core functions in smart home systems designed to support people with chronic heart failure for self-management and clinical support. Results of this study will help researchers to co-design and protyping solutions with consumers and healthcare providers to achieve these core functions to improve self-management and clinical outcomes in people with chronic heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Islam et al. (2022) studied Chronic heart failure (n=15). Smart home system functions was evaluated on Consensus on recommended functions (≥70% rating ≥7 and ≤15% rating ≤3). An expert panel of healthcare professionals agreed on 34 items as essential functions for a smart home system to support self-care for heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: