Key result
STAR mapping and ablation was associated with a significantly lower rate of atrial fibrillation recurrence (6.2%) compared to PVI-only (44%) or conventional ablation (40%).
Why the study?
Does STAR mapping and ablation reduce recurrence of atrial arrhythmias in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation compared to PVI-only or conventional ablation?
Cohort
Does STAR mapping and ablation reduce recurrence of atrial arrhythmias in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation compared to PVI-only or conventional ablation?
STAR mapping and ablation appears to significantly reduce AF recurrence compared to conventional ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF, though randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.
While pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone for invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), patients with persistent AF still have a high rate of recurrence with this method. Stochastic Trajectory Analysis of Ranked signals (STAR) mapping uses data from multiple individual wavefronts during ongoing AF to identify local drivers of persistent AF. In this non-randomized study, STAR mapping and ablation showed significantly lower recurrence of atrial arrhythmias compared to a consecutive PVI-only cohort and a propensity-matched ‘conventional ablation’ cohort (consisting of PVI plus complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation or linear ablation). This benefit was driven by a much lower rate of AF recurrence in the STAR (6.2%) cohort vs PVI-only (44%) or ‘conventional’ (40%) with no significant difference in atrial tachycardia recurrence. Additionally, AF termination rates during ablation were approximately three times higher in the STAR cohort. While the analysis is retrospective and not randomized, the STAR cohort was also the only cohort with complete cessation of anti-arrhythmic drugs at three months and Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months post-ablation per protocol. While STAR mapping appears to be a very promising new tool for treating persistent AF, history predicts at least some regression to the mean when future randomized comparisons are made. The authors have planned a multicenter randomized trial of PVI plus STAR mapping vs PVI-only for persistent AF. The global community of electrophysiologists and patients with AF eagerly awaits the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jay A. Montgomery (2020) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation. STAR mapping and ablation vs. PVI-only or conventional ablation (PVI plus complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation or linear ablation) was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence. STAR mapping and ablation was associated with a significantly lower rate of atrial fibrillation recurrence (6.2%) compared to PVI-only (44%) or conventional ablation (40%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: