Key result
Non-invasive imaging techniques, such as MRI, PET, and CT, provide valuable alternatives to invasive angiography for assessing coronary and peripheral endothelial function to gauge cardiovascular risk.
Why the study?
Endothelial dysfunction strongly predicts cardiovascular events and mortality, and while invasive angiography is the gold standard for assessment, several non-invasive imaging modalities have emerged.
Non-invasive imaging modalities offer valuable tools for assessing endothelial function, which is a key early marker of cardiovascular disease and a strong prognosticator for cardiovascular events.
May support broader endothelial assessment in research; leaves open prospective validation for clinical risk stratification.
Endothelial dysfunction is a key early mechanism in a variety of cardiovascular diseases and can be observed in larger conduit arteries as well as smaller resistance vessels (microvascular dysfunction). The presence of endothelial dysfunction is a strong prognosticator for cardiovascular events and mortality, and assessment of endothelial function can aid in selecting therapies and testing their response. While the gold standard method of measuring coronary endothelial function remains invasive angiography, several non-invasive imaging techniques have emerged for investigating both coronary and peripheral endothelial function. In this review, we will explore and summarize the current invasive and non-invasive modalities available for endothelial function assessment for clinical and research use, and discuss the strengths, limitations and future applications of each technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minhas et al. (2022) conducted a review in Endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. Imaging assessment of endothelial function was evaluated. Non-invasive imaging techniques, such as MRI, PET, and CT, provide valuable alternatives to invasive angiography for assessing coronary and peripheral endothelial function to gauge cardiovascular risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: