Key result
Cold pressor testing myocardial perfusion reserve index correlated with pharmacological stress (r=0.32) but failed to correlate with invasive measures of coronary microvascular dysfunction.
Why the study?
Does cold pressor testing (CPT) stress CMRI MPRI detect invasive coronary endothelial dysfunction in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive CAD?
Cross-Sectional (n=189)
Single-blind
Yes
Does cold pressor testing (CPT) stress CMRI MPRI detect invasive coronary endothelial dysfunction in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive CAD?
Non-invasive cold pressor testing with CMRI MPRI does not correlate with invasive measures of coronary microvascular dysfunction and is not useful for detecting CMD in symptomatic women.
CPT MPRI should not guide CMD diagnosis in symptomatic women; leaves open validation of reliable non-invasive surrogates against invasive standards.
BACKGROUND: Coronary endothelial function testing using acetylcholine is not routinely available, while non-pharmacological cold pressor testing (CPT) is considered an endothelial stressor. Noninvasive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) can detect coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). We evaluated if CPT stress CMRI MPRI could detect invasive coronary endothelial dysfunction. METHODS: Coronary reactivity testing was performed in 189 women with symptoms and signs of ischemic but no obstructive coronary artery disease as previously described plus CPT stress. Subjects also underwent pharmacologic and CPT stress during CMRI (1.5 T). Statistical analysis comparing CPT MPRI between groups was performed by Welch`s t-test and Mann-Whitney where appropriate. Anderson-Darling test and Levene test were considered to verify the normality and homogeneity of variances assumptions. Correlation analyses between CPT MPRI and both invasive and noninvasive measures of CMD were performed using Spearman correlation. RESULTS: While CPT MPRI correlated with pharmacological stress MPRI, it did not correlate with invasive measures of CMD including invasively measured responses to intracoronary (IC) adenosine, IC acetylcholine, CPT, or IC nitroglycerin. Additionally CPT MPRI was not significantly different between subjects with normal compared to abnormal pharm stress MPRI or normal compared to abnormal invasive CMD parameters. CONCLUSION: Despite correlation with pharmacological stress MPRI, non-invasive CPT MPRI does not appear to be useful for detecting CMD in symptomatic women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Landes et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (n=189). Cold pressor testing (CPT) during cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs. Invasive coronary reactivity testing (CRT) was evaluated on Correlation between CPT myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) and pharmacological stress MPRI (r = 0.32, 95% CI 0.22-0.41, p=<0.001). Cold pressor testing myocardial perfusion reserve index correlated with pharmacological stress (r=0.32) but failed to correlate with invasive measures of coronary microvascular dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: