Why the study?
Coronary endothelial dysfunction is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease but has been limited to invasive coronary angiography for assessment.
Can arterial spin labeled CMR detect differences in coronary endothelial function between healthy individuals and those with or at risk for CAD?
Observational (n=34)
Can arterial spin labeled CMR detect differences in coronary endothelial function between healthy individuals and those with or at risk for CAD?
Arterial spin labeled CMR with isometric handgrip stress is a feasible non-invasive method to detect coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with or at high risk for CAD.
Supports non-invasive ASL-CMR detection of endothelial dysfunction; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change CAD practice.
Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease, but its assessment has been limited to invasive coronary angiography. Myocardial perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeled (ASL) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may be an effective non‐invasive alternative for detection of CED. Thirty‐four patients were recruited: 10 healthy volunteers, 13 at high‐risk for coronary artery disease (CAD), and 11 with established CAD. ASL‐CMR was performed continuously in a single mid‐short axis slice during rest, stress, and recovery. Stress was induced with sustained isometric handgrip exercise, an endothelial dependent stressor. Myocardial perfusion (MP) during rest, peak stress, and recovery were calculated and compared. After excluding subjects unable to complete the protocol or who exhibited poor data quality, 6 healthy, 10 high‐risk, and 7 CAD patients were included in the analysis. Average MP (ml/g/min) was 1.31 ± 1.23, 1.61 ± 1.12, and 1.40 ± 0.97 at rest, and 1.64 ± 1.49, 2.31 ± 1.61, and 2.84 ± 1.77 during stress, for the CAD, high‐risk and healthy group, respectively. The average MP response (MPstress – MPrest, ml/g/min) was 0.32 ± 1.93, 0.69 ± 1.34, and 1.44 ± 1.46 for CAD, high‐risk and healthy group, respectively. MP during handgrip stress was significantly lower for both the CAD (p = 0.0005) and high‐risk groups (p = 0.05) compared to the healthy volunteers. In only the healthy subjects, MP was significantly higher in stress compared to rest (p = 0.0002). Participants with CAD had significantly lower MP response compared to healthy volunteers, as detected by ASL‐CMR. These findings support the feasibility of ASL‐CMR for non‐invasive assessment of CED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javed et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Coronary endothelial dysfunction (n=34). Arterial spin labeled (ASL) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with isometric handgrip exercise vs. Healthy volunteers was evaluated on Myocardial perfusion (MP) during handgrip stress (p=0.0005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: