Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 1, 1988Journal of Hypertension

24-Hour blood pressure monitoring

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Non-invasive 24-hour blood pressure monitoring using the Spacelabs 5300 device yielded similar group means to intra-arterial recording but showed large discrepancies in individual subjects.

Why the study?

Does 24-h ambulatory monitoring via the Spacelabs 5300 device accurately estimate blood pressure compared to intra-arterial recording in essential hypertensive subjects?

Population

8 essential hypertensive subjects

Comparison

24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring via… vs Simultaneous 24-h intra-arterial blood pressure…

Design

Other

Follow-up

24 hours

Authors

RCRoberto CasadeiUniversity of MilanGianfranco ParatiGianfranco ParatiGeneral / Preventive / LipidsGPG. PomidossiFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Large individual discrepancies caution against Spacelabs 5300 for patient-level ABPM decisions; leaves open validation needs in larger cohorts.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=8)

Structured PICO

Does 24-h ambulatory monitoring via the Spacelabs 5300 device accurately estimate blood pressure compared to intra-arterial recording in essential hypertensive subjects?

P
Population
8 essential hypertensive subjects undergoing simultaneous 24-hour non-invasive and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring.
E
Exposure
24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring via the Spacelabs 5300 device (measured every 15 min during the day and 30 min during the night)
C
Comparator
Simultaneous 24-h intra-arterial blood pressure recording from the contralateral arm
O
Outcome
Accuracy of 24-h blood pressure values (hourly and 24-h means for systolic and diastolic blood pressure)surrogate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 138.4% vs 142.9%

The Spacelabs 5300 device has limited ability to correctly estimate ambulatory blood pressure in individual subjects due to large discrepancies compared to intra-arterial measurements, though group means are similar.

Limitations

  • The Spacelabs 5300 device has a limited ability to correctly estimate ambulatory blood pressure in individual subjects.

Cite This Study

Casadei et al. (1988) conducted an observational in Essential hypertension (n=8). Ambulatory monitoring via Spacelabs 5300 device vs. Simultaneous 24-h intra-arterial blood pressure recording was evaluated on 24-h systolic blood pressure mean. Non-invasive 24-hour blood pressure monitoring using the Spacelabs 5300 device yielded similar group means to intra-arterial recording but showed large discrepancies in individual subjects.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2312fe6bcfca2a0e1ce8dbhttps://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-198810000-00006
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices Spacelabs 90202 and 90207 versus resting and ambulatory 24-hour intra-arterial blood pressure.1992 · 156 citations
  2. 2Reproducibility of non-invasive and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring: implications for studies on antihypertensive treatment1991 · 159 citations
  3. 3Evaluation of a New Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (Accutracker 102): Laboratory Comparisons With Direct Arterial Pressure, Stethoscopic Auscultatory Pressure, and Readings From a Similar Monitor (Spacelabs Model 5200)1988 · 56 citations
  4. 4Limited reproducibility of hourly blood pressure values obtained by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring1992 · 72 citations
  5. 5A Comparison of Two Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitors Worn at the Same Time2013 · 19 citations