Key result
Non-invasive 24-hour blood pressure monitoring using the Spacelabs 5300 device yielded similar group means to intra-arterial recording but showed large discrepancies in individual subjects.
Why the study?
Does 24-h ambulatory monitoring via the Spacelabs 5300 device accurately estimate blood pressure compared to intra-arterial recording in essential hypertensive subjects?
Population
8 essential hypertensive subjects
Comparison
24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring via… vs Simultaneous 24-h intra-arterial blood pressure…
Design
Other
Follow-up
24 hours
Authors
Loading...
Large individual discrepancies caution against Spacelabs 5300 for patient-level ABPM decisions; leaves open validation needs in larger cohorts.
Observational (n=8)
Does 24-h ambulatory monitoring via the Spacelabs 5300 device accurately estimate blood pressure compared to intra-arterial recording in essential hypertensive subjects?
Absolute Event Rate: 138.4% vs 142.9%
The Spacelabs 5300 device has limited ability to correctly estimate ambulatory blood pressure in individual subjects due to large discrepancies compared to intra-arterial measurements, though group means are similar.
Casadei et al. (1988) conducted an observational in Essential hypertension (n=8). Ambulatory monitoring via Spacelabs 5300 device vs. Simultaneous 24-h intra-arterial blood pressure recording was evaluated on 24-h systolic blood pressure mean. Non-invasive 24-hour blood pressure monitoring using the Spacelabs 5300 device yielded similar group means to intra-arterial recording but showed large discrepancies in individual subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: