Key result
Machine learning using multimodal physiological signals detects VR cybersickness symptoms with ~87% accuracy.
Why the study?
Cybersickness is a major obstacle to virtual reality adoption, but standard explicit detection via self-reported questionnaires is unsuitable for online, implicit user monitoring.
Observational (n=22)
No
Effect estimate: 86.66% accuracy
A machine learning model utilizing multimodal physiological signals can detect VR-induced cybersickness with 86.66% accuracy, offering a potential method for implicit, real-time monitoring.
May support real-time VR cybersickness monitoring; hypothesis-generating and requires larger validation before clinical adoption.
One of the major obstacles to the widespread adoption of Virtual Reality (VR) is Cybersickness. It is a sense of physical discomfort akin to motion sickness experienced by the users either during or subsequent to VR utilization. Typically, it is detected through explicit methods such as self-reported questionnaires, which are not ideal for online and implicit monitoring of users’ well-being. This study tackles the challenge of implicitly detecting and measuring Cybersickness in VR through physiological signals. Therefore, we propose a multimodal approach that integrates physiological signals with self-reported measures. We utilize a mixed-methods design combining quantitative and qualitative analyses, using a roller coaster simulation as the experimental paradigm. The research analyzes physiological data collected from a group of 22 participants exposed to a simulated VR rollercoaster experience, through statistical analysis and machine learning algorithms. The physiological markers studied include Electroencephalograms (EEG), Electrodermal Activity, Blood Volume Pulse, and skin Temperature signals. Additionally, the study elucidates the complex interplay among physiological markers using Explainable AI (XAI). We found out significant correlations between high Simulator Sickness Questionnaire scores and physiological measures such as brain rhythms and EEG indices related to engagement, visual fatigue, and drowsiness, as well as heart rate variability. Moreover, the proposed machine learning model achieves an accuracy of 86.66 % in detecting elevated Cybersickness symptoms, which is higher than the accuracy achieved by existing techniques. Further exploration using the XAI technique confirms the elevated levels of drowsiness and reduced engagement in participants experiencing elevated Cybersickness. By providing a comprehensive, multimodal approach for quantitative assessment, this study fills a gap in the existing literature and paves the path for the development of adaptive systems that modulate their behavior based on physiological data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sameri et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Cybersickness (n=22). Virtual reality roller coaster simulation vs. Baseline (pre-stimulus) or low cybersickness symptom group was evaluated on Accuracy in detecting elevated Cybersickness symptoms (86.66% accuracy). A machine learning model utilizing multimodal physiological signals achieved an accuracy of 86.66% in detecting elevated cybersickness symptoms during a VR rollercoaster simulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: