Why the study?
Adoption of virtual reality is limited by cybersickness, and there is a lack of automated objective tools to predict or detect cybersickness in individuals.
Does a spiking neural network using spatiotemporal EEG and heart rate variability predict and detect virtual reality-induced cybersickness in healthy adults?
Does a spiking neural network using spatiotemporal EEG and heart rate variability predict and detect virtual reality-induced cybersickness in healthy adults?
A spiking neural network approach combining EEG and heart rate variability can predict and detect virtual reality-induced cybersickness with approximately 75-77% accuracy.
Supports automated CS detection in VR; leaves open prospective validation before clinical or training use.
Virtual Reality (VR) is an evolving wearable technology across many domain applications, including health delivery. Yet, human physiological adoption of VR technology is limited by cybersickness (CS) - a debilitating sensation accompanied by a cluster of symptoms, including nausea, oculomotor issues and dizziness. A leading problem is the lack of automated objective tools to predict or detect CS in individuals, which can then be used for resistance training, timely warning systems or clinical intervention. This paper explores the spatiotemporal brain dynamics and heart rate variability involved in cybersickness, and uses this information to both predict and detect CS episodes. The present study applies deep learning of EEG in a spiking neural network (SNN) architecture with a fusion of sympathetic heart rate variability parameters to predict CS prior to using VR (77.5%) and detect it (75.0%), which is more accurate than using just EEG (75%, 70.3%) or ECG alone (74.2%, 72.6%). The study found that Cz (premotor and supplementary motor cortex) and O2 (primary visual cortex) are key hubs in functionally connected networks associated with both CS events and susceptibility to CS. Consequently, Cz and O2 are presented here as promising targets for therapeutic interventions to alleviate and/or prevent the cybersickness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: