Key result
Head-down tilt is linked to a ~14-fpm reduction in persistent atrial fibrillatory rate.
Why the study?
Does head-up and head-down tilting alter atrial fibrillatory rate in patients with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=40)
Does head-up and head-down tilting alter atrial fibrillatory rate in patients with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 377% vs 391%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Autonomic tone manipulation via head-up and head-down tilting significantly alters the atrial fibrillatory rate in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Head-down tilting may lower atrial fibrillatory rate in persistent AF; hypothesis-generating for autonomic effects, needs prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Changes in the autonomic nervous system (ANS) tone are present before, during, and after episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF). Atrial fibrillatory rate (AFR, the inverse of the atrial cycle length) has been used as a surrogate marker for local refractoriness and is a key characteristic of the fibrillatory process in patients with AF. Aim of this study is to assess changes in AFR, as an effect of autonomic balance change. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing cardiac cardioversion for symptomatic persistent AF were included in the study. Surface ECG was recorded during rest, head-down (HDT, -30°), and head-up tilt (HUT, +60°). A median value of AFR was computed in each phase of the protocol. RESULTS: AFR decreased during HDT compared to the baseline (B) condition in all patients but three (median AFR_B = 391 fpm vs. AFR_HDT = 377 fpm, p < .0001). HUT increased AFR, making it significantly higher than HDT and baseline conditions (median AFR_HUT = 396 fpm, p < .0001 vs. B and HDT). Heart rate (HR) increased during HUT, but had a heterogeneous behavior in the population during HDT: about one third of the patients had an HR lower during HDT than during baseline, whereas the remaining two third had an increase in HR during HDT. CONCLUSIONS: Dominant sympathetic/vagal tone during HUT/HDT significantly affects AFR, increasing/decreasing in respect to baseline. It may be worth exploring the possibility that patients with AF of shorter duration can convert to sinus rhythm during HDT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Östenson et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=40). Head-down tilt (HDT) and head-up tilt (HUT) vs. Baseline (supine position) was evaluated on Atrial fibrillatory rate (AFR) (p=<0.0001). In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, head-down tilting significantly decreased the median atrial fibrillatory rate from 391 fpm at baseline to 377 fpm, while head-up tilting increased it to 396 fpm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: