Key result
Patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation exhibited modified autonomic control, including lower LF/HF values of RR intervals in the supine position (2.0 vs 2.5, p<0.05) compared to healthy individuals.
Why the study?
The autonomic nervous system modulates paroxysmal atrial fibrillation pathogenesis, but heart rate and blood pressure variability during orthostatism had not been assessed with wavelet transform analysis in younger patients with lone PAF.
Does head-up tilt testing reveal differences in autonomic control of heart rate and blood pressure in patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation compared to healthy individuals?
Case-Control (n=34)
No
Does head-up tilt testing reveal differences in autonomic control of heart rate and blood pressure in patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation compared to healthy individuals?
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 2.5%
p-value: p=<0.05
Patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation exhibit altered autonomic control of heart rate and blood pressure in the supine position and during early orthostatic stress, suggesting underlying autonomic nervous system disturbances.
Indicates autonomic imbalance in lone PAF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) has been recognized as an important modulator in the pathogenesis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Changes in ANS control of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) variability occur during orthostatism to maintain cardiovascular homeostasis. The wavelet transform (WT) has been used as a tool that provides a time-frequency decomposition of the signal under investigation, allowing intermittent components to be elucidated. Aim: To study HR and BP variability with WT analysis in younger patients (P) with PAF and normal echocardiographic findings, and in healthy individuals (HI) during head-up tilt (HUT). Methods: 17P with lone PAF (age <60 years [33-59], 9 men) and 17 HI (<60years [20-59], 8 men) underwent passive HUT (70) while on sinus rhythm. Continuous monitoring of ECG and BP was obtained without antiarrhythmic drug medication. Acute changes in RR-intervals and systolic BP were evaluated with WT, and LF (low-frequency power), HF (high-frequency power) and LF/HF calculated for 1) the last 2 minutes of the supine period; 2) the 15 seconds of tilting movement (TM); 3) 1st and 2nd minutes of HUT. Results: RR intervals were identical for the two groups in baseline and during HUT. Supine basal BP was similar for both groups. During HUT, two BP response profiles were observed: a sustained increase in PAF P, and a decrease followed by an increase and further recovery in HI. WT analysis of RR intervals for PAF P, when compared to HI, showed lower LF/HF values in the supine position (2.00.5 vs. 2.50.3, p<0.05), and a decreased LF power during TM (574134 ms vs. 1347393 ms, p<0.05). In the 1st and 2nd minutes of HUT, changes were comparable in PAF P and in HI. Analysis of systolic BP for PAF P, compared to HI, showed statistically significant differences regarding lower HF values in basal (0.690.14 ms vs 1.050.13 ms, p<0.05) and lower LF and LF/HF values during TM (6.32.5 ms vs 8.21.6 ms, 8.42.9 vs 12.84.4; p<0.05). No differences were detected with respect to the 1st and 2nd minutes of HUT. Conclusion: P with PAF presented modified autonomic control of HR and BP in the supine position and during the initial phase of orthostatism. These findings suggest that wavelets analysis may provide a new insight into the assessment of the dynamicity of autonomic cardiovascular regulation and underscore the presence of ANS disturbances in PAF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mário Oliveira (2020) conducted a case-control in Lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=34). Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation vs. Healthy individuals was evaluated on LF/HF ratio of RR intervals in the supine position (p=<0.05). Patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation exhibited modified autonomic control, including lower LF/HF values of RR intervals in the supine position (2.0 vs 2.5, p<0.05) compared to healthy individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: