Key result
Patients with coronary artery disease had significantly longer left ventricular activation times compared to those with dilated cardiomyopathy (134 vs 115 ms, P<0.05).
Why the study?
What is the spectrum of inter- and intraventricular conduction abnormalities in patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Cross-Sectional (n=26)
What is the spectrum of inter- and intraventricular conduction abnormalities in patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Absolute Event Rate: 134% vs 115%
p-value: p=<0.05
In CRT candidates, CAD patients have more pronounced intraventricular conduction abnormalities compared to DCM patients, and standard ECG is less reliable in characterizing these complex abnormalities.
CAD patients may have more delayed LV activation in CRT candidates; cross-sectional data leaves open etiology-specific mapping benefits.
Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has clearly demonstrated its clinical benefit in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and intraventricular conduction abnormalities, selection of eligible patients and/or optimal pacing site are still a matter of debate. The aim of the study was to analyze the spectrum of conduction abnormalities in CRT candidates. A total of 26 patients (mean age 62 +/- 9 years) with CHF and conduction disturbances (QRS > or = 130 ms) were studied. The underlying heart disease was dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (n = 12) or coronary artery disease (CAD) (n = 14). High density, left ventricular endocardial activation maps were constructed using an electroanatomic mapping system (CARTO). Based on endocardial activation patterns, left ventricular conduction abnormalities were classified as left bundle branch block (LBBB) (n = 9), nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbances (n = 10), and the bifascicular block (n = 7). In DCM patients the endocardial activation sequences corresponded with a 12-lead ECG pattern with a homogeneous spread of activation wavefront and the latest activation laterally (LBBB) or anteriorly (bifascicular block), respectively. CAD patients presented with variable activation patterns that reflected the location of the postinfarct scar, and the 12-lead ECG was less predictive. Although there was a trend for longer QRS durations for DCM subjects (170 +/- 23 vs 156 +/- 23 ms, P = NS), left ventricular activation time was significantly longer in the CAD group (115 +/- 21 ms vs 134 +/- 23 ms, P < 0.05). CRT candidates represent a broad spectrum of conduction abnormality patterns with variable inter- and intraventricular activation delays. CAD subjects have more pronounced intraventricular conduction abnormality. The standard ECG is less reliable in the characterization of complex conduction abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peichl et al. (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in Congestive heart failure with conduction disturbances (n=26). Coronary artery disease vs. Dilated cardiomyopathy was evaluated on Left ventricular activation time (p=<0.05). Patients with coronary artery disease had significantly longer left ventricular activation times compared to those with dilated cardiomyopathy (134 vs 115 ms, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: