Key result
New HR BSPM parameters significantly discriminated between MI patients with and without ventricular tachycardia, with STT_DI showing the highest sensitivity (0.77) and TSI_DI the highest specificity (0.79).
Why the study?
Do novel repolarization parameters derived from high resolution body surface potential mapping improve risk assessment for ventricular tachycardia in patients with remote myocardial infarction?
Case-Control (n=65)
Do novel repolarization parameters derived from high resolution body surface potential mapping improve risk assessment for ventricular tachycardia in patients with remote myocardial infarction?
New depolarization and repolarization inhomogeneity indices from body surface potential maps can successfully differentiate post-MI patients at high risk for ventricular tachycardia.
May support VT risk stratification in post-MI patients; leaves open prospective validation of BSPM parameters.
BACKGROUND: The effective screening of myocardial infarction (MI) patients threatened by ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important issue in clinical practice, especially in the process of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy recommendation. This study proposes new parameters describing depolarization and repolarization inhomogeneity in high resolution body surface potential maps (HR BSPM) to identify MI patients threatened by VT. MATERIAL/METHODS: High resolution ECGs were recorded from 64 surface leads. Time-averaged HR BSPMs were used. Several parameters for arrhythmia risk assessment were calculated in 2 groups of MI patients: those with and without documented VT. Additionally, a control group of healthy subjects was studied. To assess the risk of VT, the following parameters were proposed: correlation coefficient between STT and QRST integral maps (STT_QRST_CORR), departure index of absolute value of STT integral map (STT_DI), and departure index of absolute value of T-wave shape index (TSI_DI). These new parameters were compared to known parameters: QRS width, QT interval, QT dispersion, Tpeak-Tend interval, total cosines between QRS complex and T wave, and non-dipolar content of QRST integral maps. RESULTS: STT_DI, TSI_DI, STT_QRST_CORR, QRS width, and QT interval parameters were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) in arrhythmia risk assessment. The highest sensitivity was found for the STT_DI parameter (0.77) and the highest specificity for TSI_DI (0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Arrhythmia risk is demonstrated by both abnormal spatial distribution of the repolarization phase and changed relationship between depolarization and repolarization phases, as well as their prolongation. The proposed new parameters might be applied for risk stratification of cardiac arrhythmia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fereniec et al. (2011) conducted a case-control in Myocardial infarction at risk of ventricular tachycardia (n=65). High resolution body surface potential mapping (HR BSPM) repolarization parameters (STT_DI, TSI_DI, STT_QRST_CORR) vs. MI patients without VT and healthy volunteers was evaluated on Discrimination between MI patients with and without documented ventricular tachycardia (p=<0.01). New HR BSPM parameters significantly discriminated between MI patients with and without ventricular tachycardia, with STT_DI showing the highest sensitivity (0.77) and TSI_DI the highest specificity (0.79).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: