Key result
High-frequency TTNS delays the urge to urinate while low-frequency TTNS accelerates it versus control.
Why the study?
The mechanisms underpinning tibial nerve stimulation and how its inhibition of brainstem and spinal cord activity alters bladder function remain not fully understood.
Does transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) alter the time to urge to urinate in healthy adults?
RCT (n=41)
Single-blind
Pseudo-randomized
No
Does transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) alter the time to urge to urinate in healthy adults?
p-value: p=<0.001
Low-frequency (1 Hz) tibial nerve stimulation accelerates the urge to void, while high-frequency (20 Hz) delays it, providing a potential non-invasive treatment for urinary retention.
May support frequency-specific TTNS for voiding disorders; extends RCT evidence on neuromodulation of bladder urge.
Despite widespread clinical adoption for disorders of incontinence such as overactive bladder, there remain unknowns sur-rounding the mechanism that underpins Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TNS). Current understanding suggests that TNS counteracts incontinence by the inhibition of brainstem and spinal cord activity. How this inhibition alters bladder function is not fully understood. We hypothesize that the supraspinal components of the system act as a high-pass filter, allowing voiding signals to proceed only when bladder filling reaches a critical level. Testing this hypothesis may explain how TNS is able to induce both an inhibitory and a little-explored excitatory effect on bladder activity in response to high-frequency (20 Hz) and low-frequency (1 Hz) stimulation, respectively. We performed a single-blinded trial in healthy human participants administered high and low-frequency Transcutaneous TNS. We also developed a computational model of the lower-urinary tract and control circuit to study the frequency-dependent effects of TNS. For the first time, we report a frequency-dependent effect of TNS via the ability to alter urge perception and up-regulate and down-regulate bladder activity, corroborating model predictions. These results provide a foundation for the development of targeted and effective TNS therapies, benefiting from in silico models. We hope that future clinical research will determine the efficacy of low-frequency TNS as a non-invasive treatment option for urinary retention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McConnell-Trevillion et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=41). Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TTNS) vs. No stimulation was evaluated on Time to onset of the first urge to urinate (p=<0.001). Low-frequency (1 Hz) transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation significantly decreased the time to onset of the urge to urinate (p=0.03), whereas high-frequency (20 Hz) stimulation significantly delayed it (p<0.01) compared to control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: