Key result
The spontaneous baroreflex method demonstrated good reproducibility of baroreflex sensitivity between two consecutive days, with mean coefficients of variation ranging from 13.9% to 19.7%.
Why the study?
Does the spontaneous baroreflex method provide reproducible measurements of baroreflex sensitivity at rest and during laboratory tests in healthy volunteers?
Population
20 healthy volunteers
Comparison
Measurement of spontaneous baroreflex… vs Repeated measurements 24 hours later under the…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
24 hours
Authors
Loading...
Supports reliable spontaneous BRS assessment in healthy volunteers; extends methodological validation but leaves open clinical translation.
Observational (n=20)
No
Does the spontaneous baroreflex method provide reproducible measurements of baroreflex sensitivity at rest and during laboratory tests in healthy volunteers?
The spontaneous baroreflex method provides good reproducibility for assessing baroreflex sensitivity at rest and during physiological stress tests.
lellamo et al. (1996) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=20). Spontaneous baroreflex method vs. Measurements taken 24 hours apart was evaluated on Reproducibility of arterial baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) between two consecutive days. The spontaneous baroreflex method demonstrated good reproducibility of baroreflex sensitivity between two consecutive days, with mean coefficients of variation ranging from 13.9% to 19.7%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: