Key result
CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizers had a 1.37-fold higher overall incidence of metoprolol-related adverse events compared to normal metabolizers (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05-1.79, p=0.021).
Why the study?
The impact of updated CYP2D6 genotyping consensus on metoprolol tolerance and adverse events in elderly Chinese patients with cardiovascular diseases remained unclear.
Does CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizer phenotype increase adverse events and reduce tolerance to metoprolol in elderly Chinese patients with cardiovascular diseases?
Cohort (n=1,036)
No
Does CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizer phenotype increase adverse events and reduce tolerance to metoprolol in elderly Chinese patients with cardiovascular diseases?
Odds Ratio: 1.37 (95% CI 1.05–1.79)
Absolute Event Rate: 56.9% vs 48.4%
p-value: p=0.021
CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizers have lower tolerance and a higher incidence of adverse events to metoprolol compared to normal metabolizers among elderly Chinese patients, suggesting genotyping may optimize safety.
Does not support routine CYP2D6 testing yet; hypothesis-generating for genotype-guided dosing in elderly Chinese patients.
The latest consensus has changed CYP2D6 genotyping among Chinese population, while its impact on metoprolol tolerance and adverse events in elderly Chinese patients with cardiovascular diseases remains unclear. In this study, we prospectively included elderly patients who started metoprolol treatment for cardiovascular indications. According to the latest consensus on CYP2D6 genotype-to-phenotype translation, the patients were categorized as normal, intermediate, or poor metabolizers (NMs, IMs, or PMs, respectively) by detecting the presence of the CYP2D6*1 , *2 , *5 , *10 , and *14 . Logistic regression model was used to analyze the correlation between the CYP2D6 phenotype and incidence of adverse events, which were assessed over a 12-week period. In this study, there were 651 (62.7%) NMs, 385 (37.1%) IMs, and 3 (0.3%) PMs. After 12 weeks of follow-up, compared with NMs, IMs had the lower maintenance dose [50.0 (25.0–50.0) mg/day vs. 25.0 (25.0–50.0) mg/day, p < 0.001] and lower weight-adjusted maintenance doses (0.52 ± 0.25 mg/day/kg vs. 0.42 ± 0.22 mg/day/kg, p < 0.001), and had higher incidence of postural hypotension (6.0% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.006), bradycardia (21.5% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.011), asystole (0.8% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.009) and syncope (2.0% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.001). In logistic regression model, the overall incidence of adverse events was 1.37-fold larger in IMs than in NMs (odds ratio = 1.37, 95% confidence interval = 1.05–1.79, p = 0.021). We conclude that IMs have lower tolerance and higher incidence of metoprolol-related adverse events than NMs in elderly Chinese patients with cardiovascular diseases. CYP2D6 genotyping is justifiable in elderly patients to minimize the risk of adverse events and ensure the benefits of metoprolol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular diseases (n=1,036). CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizer phenotype vs. CYP2D6 normal metabolizer phenotype was evaluated on Overall incidence of adverse events (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05-1.79, p=0.021). CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizers had a 1.37-fold higher overall incidence of metoprolol-related adverse events compared to normal metabolizers (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05-1.79, p=0.021).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: