Key result
CYP2D6 genotype was not significantly associated with overall adverse effects during metoprolol treatment, though cold extremities were more frequent in PMs/IMs vs EMs/UMs (16.0% vs 4.2%; P=0.056).
Why the study?
Does CYP2D6 genotype-derived phenotype impact the tolerability and adverse effects of metoprolol in patients treated in primary care?
Observational (n=121)
Yes
Does CYP2D6 genotype-derived phenotype impact the tolerability and adverse effects of metoprolol in patients treated in primary care?
Effect estimate: RR 3.8 (95% CI 1.03-14.3)
Absolute Event Rate: 16% vs 4.2%
p-value: p=0.056
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
No support for CYP2D6-guided metoprolol dosing in primary care; leaves open possible cold extremities link for prospective confirmation.
Fux et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=121). Metoprolol vs. CYP2D6 genotype-derived phenotype (EMs+UMs vs PMs+IMs) was evaluated on Cold extremities (RR 3.8, 95% CI 1.03-14.3, p=0.056). CYP2D6 genotype was not significantly associated with overall adverse effects during metoprolol treatment, though cold extremities were more frequent in PMs/IMs vs EMs/UMs (16.0% vs 4.2%; P=0.056).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: