Key result
CYP2D6 poor metabolizers had a significantly lower metoprolol maintenance dose compared to non-poor metabolizers (48 vs 84 mg; P=0.019).
Why the study?
Whether metoprolol dose adjustments are indicated in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers had not been well studied.
Does the CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype affect the maintenance dose of metoprolol in a chronic Dutch patient population?
Observational (n=105)
Does the CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype affect the maintenance dose of metoprolol in a chronic Dutch patient population?
Absolute Event Rate: 48% vs 84%
p-value: p=0.019
Patients with the CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype require a significantly lower maintenance dose of metoprolol, suggesting a potential benefit for genotype-guided dose titration.
May support CYP2D6-guided metoprolol dosing; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Metoprolol is among the most frequently prescribed β-blockers for the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases. Genetic polymorphism within CYP2D6 has been shown to affect the rate of metabolism of metoprolol. Whether metoprolol dose adjustments are indicated in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PMs) has thus far not well been studied. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the CYP2D6 genotype on the metoprolol maintenance dose in a chronic Dutch patient population. Patients were included if they were treated with metoprolol and in whom CYP2D6 genotype status was known. Patient and treatment characteristics were obtained retrospectively from the electronic healthcare records. Metoprolol maintenance dose was the primary endpoint and was defined as the last known dose that the patients had been treated with. Genotype data were categorized into four phenotypes, that is, PMs, intermediate metabolizers, extensive metabolizers, and ultra-rapid metabolizers (UMs). The endpoints were analyzed as PM versus non-PM. A total of 105 patients were included. The mean ± SD maintenance dose in PMs (n = 12) was significantly lower compared with non-PMs (n = 93), that is, 48 ± 20 versus 84 ± 53 mg, respectively (P = 0.019). No association of the CYP2D6 genotype with the incidence of side effects was observed, although there was a trend for increased risk of drowsiness (P = 0.053). The results of this study show that the CYP2D6 genotype is associated with the maintenance dose of metoprolol. Patients with the CYP2D6 PM phenotype may benefit from a lower metoprolol starting dose, followed by further dose titration to provide patient-tailored therapy and thereby increase the effectiveness of treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poulussen et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular diseases (n=105). CYP2D6 poor metabolizer (PM) genotype vs. Non-poor metabolizer (non-PM) genotype was evaluated on Metoprolol maintenance dose (p=0.019). CYP2D6 poor metabolizers had a significantly lower metoprolol maintenance dose compared to non-poor metabolizers (48 vs 84 mg; P=0.019).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: