Why the study?
Does the Autocorrelated Differential Algorithm (ADA) accurately measure heart rate and respiratory activity from seismocardiography in male subjects?
Does the Autocorrelated Differential Algorithm (ADA) accurately measure heart rate and respiratory activity from seismocardiography in male subjects?
The Autocorrelated Differential Algorithm provides accurate real-time seismocardiography measurements of heart rate and respiratory activity, offering a potential tool for physiological monitoring.
Supports algorithm refinement for seismocardiography; leaves open clinical adoption pending larger, diverse validation studies.
We present a novel seismocardiography (SCG)-based approach for real-time cardio-respiratory activity measurement called the Autocorrelated Differential Algorithm (ADA). Measurements were performed on ten male subjects in the supine position for three 7-minute-long sets each, corresponding to 14,619 heartbeats. The ADA utilized temporal variations, windowing, and autocorrelation to produce physiological measurements corresponding to heart rate (HR), and left ventricular ejection time, and estimations of respiration rate, volume, and phase. The versatility of the ADA was investigated in two contexts: physical exertion and heart rate variability. The accuracy of HR measurements at a sampling frequency of 200 Hz resulted in a correlation coefficient ( <tex-math notation="LaTeX">r² </tex-math> ) of 0.9808 when compared with a manual annotation of all datasets. Its reproducibility was tested on externally obtained SCG and electrocardiography datasets, which produced an <tex-math notation="LaTeX">r² </tex-math> of 0.8224. The accuracy and computational time were also characterized by different sampling frequencies to quantify performance. The recommended sampling frequency is 200 Hz corresponding to a computation time of 0.05 s per instantaneous measurement using a standard desktop computer. The ADA delivered real-time SCG measurements with a refresh rate that was dependent on the computational time per measurement, which could be decreased by lowering the sampling frequency. The presented algorithm offers a novel tool toward real-time physiological monitoring in clinical and everyday scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Mello et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: