Key result
Photoplethysmography and pulse rate variability parameters showed significant differences pre- and post-treatment and highly correlated with heart rate variability in chronic MPS patients.
Why the study?
Can photoplethysmography (PPG) signals and pulse rate variability (PRV) be used to assess pain intensity in patients with chronic myofascial pain syndrome?
Observational (n=37)
Can photoplethysmography (PPG) signals and pulse rate variability (PRV) be used to assess pain intensity in patients with chronic myofascial pain syndrome?
Pulse rate variability derived from photoplethysmography can substitute for heart rate variability in assessing pain intensity and autonomic nervous system changes in chronic myofascial pain syndrome.
PPG-derived PRV may support noninvasive autonomic monitoring in chronic MPS; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Efficacy of pain assessment is the basis for effective therapy. Clinically, assessing pain is by subjective scale, but these methods have some shortcomings. Therefore, studies have been conducted on assessment of pain using physiological signals. Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals provide much information about the cardiovascular system. PPG-derived parameters (PPG parameters) reflect nociceptive stimulation, and obtain an approximation of the R-R interval from the PPG period. The aim of this study was to evaluate PPG signals for assessment of pain intensity in chronic myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) patients. METHODS: This study recruited 37 patients with chronic MPS; all of them were treated with electrotherapy and thermotherapy. The difference between pre- and post-therapy PPG parameters, and the correlation between pulse rate variability (PRV) and heart rate variability (HRV) were determined. We also obtained patients' pain intensity scores by visual analog scale, visual rating scale, and Wong-Banker face pain rating scale. RESULTS: Photoplethysmography and PRV/HRV parameters showed significant differences between pre- and post-treatment. The variation trend of PRV was similar with HRV in heart rate, R-R interval, low frequency, high frequency, and LF/HF; in addition, a high correlation between the parameters was observed either in pre- or post-therapy. PPG parameters indicated increased sympathetic tone. CONCLUSION: The results of the study indicated that PRV substituted for HRV in assessment of pain intensity in chronic MPS reflected parasympathetic nervous tone increase, and PPG parameters might reflect stress stimulation on skin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Chronic myofascial pain syndrome (n=37). Photoplethysmography (PPG) signal assessment vs. Heart rate variability (HRV) and pre-treatment baseline was evaluated on Difference between pre- and post-therapy PPG parameters and correlation between PRV and HRV. Photoplethysmography and pulse rate variability parameters showed significant differences pre- and post-treatment and highly correlated with heart rate variability in chronic MPS patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: