Key result
Refractory hypertension was associated with greater left ventricular mass index (88.3 vs 54.6 g/m2; P<0.001) but not larger intracardiac volumes compared with controlled resistant hypertension.
Why the study?
Is refractory hypertension characterized by persistent fluid retention, as indexed by greater intracardiac volumes on cardiac magnetic resonance, compared to controlled resistant hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=54)
No
Is refractory hypertension characterized by persistent fluid retention, as indexed by greater intracardiac volumes on cardiac magnetic resonance, compared to controlled resistant hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 88.3% vs 54.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Refractory hypertension is associated with greater left ventricular hypertrophy but not increased intracardiac volumes, suggesting its mechanism is not driven by intravascular fluid retention.
Refractory hypertension was associated with LV hypertrophy without volume expansion; leaves open non-fluid mechanisms for prospective study.
Refractory hypertension (RfHTN) is an extreme phenotype of antihypertensive treatment failure defined as lack of blood pressure control with ≥5 medications, including a long-acting thiazide and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. RfHTN is a subgroup of resistant hypertension (RHTN), which is defined as blood pressure >135/85 mm Hg with ≥3 antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic. RHTN is generally attributed to persistent intravascular fluid retention. It is unknown whether alternative mechanisms are operative in RfHTN. Our objective was to determine whether RfHTN is characterized by persistent fluid retention, indexed by greater intracardiac volumes determined by cardiac magnetic resonance when compared with controlled RHTN patients. Consecutive patients evaluated in our institution with RfHTN and controlled RHTN were prospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria included advanced chronic kidney disease and masked or white coat hypertension. All enrolled patients underwent biochemical testing and cardiac magnetic resonance. The RfHTN group (n=24) was younger (mean age, 51.7±8.9 versus 60.6±11.5 years; P =0.003) and had a greater proportion of women (75.0% versus 43%; P =0.02) compared with the controlled RHTN group (n=30). RfHTN patients had a greater left ventricular mass index (88.3±35.0 versus 54.6±12.5 g/m 2 ; P <0.001), posterior wall thickness (10.1±3.1 versus 7.7±1.5 mm; P =0.001), and septal wall thickness (14.5±3.8 versus 10.0±2.2 mm; P <0.001). There was no difference in B-type natriuretic peptide levels and left atrial or ventricular volumes. Diastolic dysfunction was noted in RfHTN. Our findings demonstrate greater left ventricular hypertrophy without chamber enlargement in RfHTN, suggesting that antihypertensive treatment failure is not attributable to intravascular volume retention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Velasco et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Refractory hypertension (n=54). Refractory hypertension vs. Controlled resistant hypertension was evaluated on Left ventricular mass index (g/m2) (p=<0.001). Refractory hypertension was associated with greater left ventricular mass index (88.3 vs 54.6 g/m2; P<0.001) but not larger intracardiac volumes compared with controlled resistant hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: