Key result
Controlled resistant hypertension links to ~13% higher LVMI versus non-resistant hypertension despite comparable diastolic function.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether patients with controlled resistant hypertension have higher left ventricular mass index, larger intracardiac volumes, and worse diastolic dysfunction compared to controlled non-resistant hypertension due to intravascular volume excess.
Does controlled resistant hypertension associate with higher LVMI, larger intracardiac volumes, and more diastolic dysfunction compared to controlled non-resistant hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=132)
No
Does controlled resistant hypertension associate with higher LVMI, larger intracardiac volumes, and more diastolic dysfunction compared to controlled non-resistant hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 64.4% vs 56.9%
p-value: p=0.017
Patients with controlled resistant hypertension have higher left ventricular mass index but comparable diastolic function and intracardiac volumes compared to those with controlled non-resistant hypertension.
Supports echocardiographic surveillance for higher LVMI in controlled resistant hypertension; leaves open prognostic implications and therapeutic targets.
Resistant hypertension (RHTN), defined as blood pressure (BP) that is uncontrolled with ≥3 medications, including a long-acting thiazide diuretic, also includes a subset with BP that is controlled with ≥4 medications, so-called controlled RHTN. This resistance is attributed to intravascular volume excess. Patients with RHTN overall have a higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and diastolic dysfunction compared to patients with non-RHTN. We tested the hypothesis that patients with controlled RHTN due to the intravascular volume excess have higher left ventricular mass index (LVMI), higher prevalence of LVH, larger intracardiac volumes, and more diastolic dysfunction compared to patients with controlled non-resistant hypertension (CHTN), defined as BP controlled with ≤3 anti-hypertensive medications. Patients with controlled RHTN (n = 69) or CHTN (n = 63) who were treated at the University of Alabama at Birmingham were offered enrollment and underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Diastolic function was assessed by peak filling rate, time needed in diastole to recover 80% of stroke volume, E:A ratios and left atrial volume. LVMI was higher in patients with controlled RHTN (64.4 ± 22.5 vs 56.9 ± 11.5; P = .017). Intracardiac volumes were similar in both groups. Diastolic function parameters were not significantly different between groups. There were no significant differences in age, gender, race, body mass index, dyslipidemia between the two groups. The findings show that patients with controlled RHTN have higher LVMI, but comparable diastolic function to those of patients with CHTN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matanes et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Controlled resistant hypertension (n=132). Controlled resistant hypertension vs. Controlled non-resistant hypertension was evaluated on Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (p=0.017). Controlled resistant hypertension was associated with higher left ventricular mass index compared to controlled non-resistant hypertension (64.4 vs 56.9; P=0.017), but comparable diastolic function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: