Key result
Cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents significantly reduced cardiac mortality compared with bare metal stents (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.49-0.91; P=0.01) at a median follow-up of 720 days.
Why the study?
Do cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents reduce cardiac mortality compared to bare metal stents?
Meta-Analysis (n=4,896)
Yes
Do cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents reduce cardiac mortality compared to bare metal stents?
Hazard Ratio: 0.67 (95% CI 0.49–0.91)
p-value: p=0.01
Cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents significantly improve cardiovascular outcomes, including cardiac survival, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis, compared to bare metal stents.
Supports preferring cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting over bare metal stents to lower cardiac mortality; confirms benefit in pooled randomized data.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety and effectiveness of cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents compared with bare metal stents. DESIGN: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Cox proportional regression models stratified by trial, containing random effects, were used to assess the impact of stent type on outcomes. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval for outcomes were reported. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomised controlled trials that compared cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents with bare metal stents were selected. The principal investigators whose trials met the inclusion criteria provided data for individual patients. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was cardiac mortality. Secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, definite or probable stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularisation, and all cause death. RESULTS: The search yielded five randomised controlled trials, comprising 4896 participants. Compared with patients receiving bare metal stents, participants receiving cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents had a significant reduction of cardiac mortality (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.91; P=0.01), myocardial infarction (0.71, 0.55 to 0.92; P=0.01), definite stent thrombosis (0.41, 0.22 to 0.76; P=0.005), definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.48, 0.31 to 0.73; P<0.001), and target vessel revascularisation (0.29, 0.20 to 0.41; P<0.001) at a median follow-up of 720 days. There was no significant difference in all cause death between groups (0.83, 0.65 to 1.06; P=0.14). Findings remained unchanged at multivariable regression after adjustment for the acuity of clinical syndrome (for instance, acute coronary syndrome v stable coronary artery disease), diabetes mellitus, female sex, use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and up to one year v longer duration treatment with dual antiplatelets. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis offers evidence that compared with bare metal stents the use of cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents improves global cardiovascular outcomes including cardiac survival, myocardial infarction, and overall stent thrombosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valgimigli et al. (2014) reported a meta-analysis. Cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents vs. Bare metal stents was evaluated on cardiac mortality (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.91, p=0.01). Cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents significantly reduced cardiac mortality compared with bare metal stents (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.49-0.91; P=0.01) at a median follow-up of 720 days.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: