Key result
An elevated ratio of heart rate recovery to recovery diastolic blood pressure (HRR/RecDBP > 0.63) during treadmill testing was significantly associated with the recurrence of vasovagal syncope (HR 3.29).
Why the study?
Does the ratio of heart rate recovery to recovery diastolic blood pressure (HRR/RecDBP) during a treadmill test predict the induction and recurrence of vasovagal syncope?
Cohort (n=284)
Single-blind
No
Does the ratio of heart rate recovery to recovery diastolic blood pressure (HRR/RecDBP) during a treadmill test predict the induction and recurrence of vasovagal syncope?
Hazard Ratio: 3.29 (95% CI 0.95–11.3)
p-value: p=0.049
The ratio of heart rate recovery to recovery diastolic blood pressure (HRR/RecDBP) during a standard treadmill test can serve as a simple, non-invasive predictor for the induction and recurrence of vasovagal syncope.
May aid noninvasive recurrence risk stratification in vasovagal syncope; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The induction and recurrence of syncope is a concerning situation that could be unpredicted in the vasovagal syncope (VVS). We investigated a simple predictor for the induced and recurrent VVS during Head-Up table-tilt Test (HUT) and clinically follow-up. METHODS: The 143 consecutive patients with VVS (age 31 ± 19 years, 33 male) who referred by a cardiologist or neurologist and had undergone an echocardiogram, HUT, and a treadmill exercise test (TMT) were recruited and clinically follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on the result of HUT and TMT. The data was analyzed and compared between VVS patients and control 141 patients without VVS who were enrolled in the same study period (age 40 ± 5 years, 117 male). RESULTS: The heart rate recovery (HRR), recovery systolic blood pressure (RecSBP), recovery diastolic blood pressure (RecDBP), HRR/RecSBP and HRR/RecDBP were significantly different between controls and VVS during the TMT. Within VVS, even if, baseline characteristics were similar between negative and positive HUT (n = 92 vs. n = 51). HRR (31 ± 10 vs. 35 ± 10), HRR/RecSBP (0.24 ± 0.09 vs. 0.28 ± 0.09) and HRR/RecDBP (0.49 ± 0.18 vs. 0.58 ± 0.19) were significantly different between negative and positive HUT results. Especially, HRR/RecSBP and HRR/RecDBP were significantly correlated with induced syncope with a sensitivity and specificity ([60%, 83%] cut-off, 0.31; [72%, 80%] cut-off, 0.63). In the Cox regression, HRR/ RecDBP were significantly associated with recurrence of VVS with hazard ratio of 3.29 (confidence interval, 0.95 to 11.3; p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: HRR/RecDBP may be a useful predictor for induction during HUT and recurrence during follow-up in the VVS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Vasovagal syncope (n=284). Heart rate recovery to recovery diastolic blood pressure ratio (HRR/RecDBP) > 0.63 vs. HRR/RecDBP < 0.63 was evaluated on Recurrence of vasovagal syncope (HR 3.29, 95% CI 0.95-11.3, p=0.049). An elevated ratio of heart rate recovery to recovery diastolic blood pressure (HRR/RecDBP > 0.63) during treadmill testing was significantly associated with the recurrence of vasovagal syncope (HR 3.29).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: