Key result
Baseline heart rate plus tilt-test pattern predicts poor outcomes in pediatric cardioinhibitory VVS.
Why the study?
Clinically feasible simple methods for prognostic assessment of cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope in children are rare.
Cohort (n=403)
No
Effect estimate: AUC 0.71
p-value: p=<0.001
The combination of baseline heart rate and head-up tilt test mode provides a useful prognostic prediction model for pediatric patients with cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope undergoing non-pharmacological therapy.
May aid risk stratification in pediatric cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Objectives: Clinically feasible simple methods for prognostic assessment of cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope (VVS) are rare. This study investigated the predictive utility of head-up tile test (HUTT) data among cardioinhibitory VVS children with non-pharmacological therapy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 403 children with VVS who had cardioinhibitory responses induced by HUTT. The children were aged 4–18 years old, including 178 males and 225 females. After the non-pharmacological interventions and follow-up, they were divided into the good prognosis group (233 cases) and the poor prognosis group (170 cases). Results: (1) Comparison between groups: Compared with the good prognosis group, the baseline heart rate (HR0) in the poor prognosis group was lower, and the proportion of sublingual nitroglycerin-provoked HUTT (SNHUT) was higher (p < 0.05). (2) Univariate analysis: Univariate analysis showed that HR0 was a protective factor on the prognosis of VVS, while SNHUT was a risk factor for the prognosis of VVS. (3) Multivariate analysis: HR0 was an independent protective factor on the prognosis of VVS. That is, for every 1 bpm increase in HR0, the risk of poor prognosis of VVS decreased by 3%. SNHUT was an independent risk factor for the prognosis of VVS, and the risk of poor prognosis of VVS increased by 3.34 times compared with basic HUTT (BHUT). (4) Evaluation of diagnostic tests: The combination of HR0 and HUTT mode had a good prognostic prediction effect for VVS (AUC = 0.71, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The combination of HR0 and HUTT mode demonstrates robust prognostic predictive value for non-pharmacological interventions in pediatric patients with VVS exhibiting cardioinhibitory responses during HUTT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope (VVS) (n=403). Baseline heart rate and sublingual nitroglycerin-provoked HUTT (SNHUT) vs. Basic HUTT (BHUT) was evaluated on Prediction of poor prognosis of VVS after non-pharmacological intervention (AUC 0.71, p=<0.001). The combination of baseline heart rate and head-up tilt test mode demonstrated significant prognostic predictive value for poor outcomes in pediatric patients with cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope (AUC 0.71).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: