Why the study?
The early phase of the T-wave can be affected by ST-segment changes during ischemia, potentially limiting T-wave time-warping indices of repolarization dispersion.
Does time-warping analysis of the T-wave peak-to-end interval (dw) improve the quantification of ventricular repolarization dispersion during ischemia compared to classical ECG indices in patients undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=101)
No
Does time-warping analysis of the T-wave peak-to-end interval (dw) improve the quantification of ventricular repolarization dispersion during ischemia compared to classical ECG indices in patients undergoing PCI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The dw index robustly tracks ischemia-induced variations in repolarization dispersion, avoiding artifacts from ST segment changes, and may help evaluate ventricular arrhythmia risk.
Variations in the dispersion of ventricular repolarization can be quantified by T-wave time-warping based index, <tex-math notation="LaTeX">dw</tex-math> . However, the early phase of the T-wave can be affected by ST-segment changes during ischemia. We hypothesized that restricting <tex-math notation="LaTeX">dw</tex-math> to the T-wave peak-to-end ( <tex-math notation="LaTeX">Tₚₑ</tex-math> ) would circumvent this limitation while still quantifying variations in repolarization dispersion. A total of 101 ECG recordings from patients undergoing coronary occlusion, together with their control recordings, were analyzed. A series of <tex-math notation="LaTeX">dw</tex-math> values was calculated by quantifying the <tex-math notation="LaTeX">Tₚₑ</tex-math> morphological variations between the T-waves at different occlusion stages and a baseline T-wave. We introduced a normalized version of <tex-math notation="LaTeX">dw</tex-math> , <tex-math notation="LaTeX">Rd</tex-math> , reflecting variations of <tex-math notation="LaTeX">dw</tex-math> during occlusion relative to control recordings ( <tex-math notation="LaTeX">Rd = 1</tex-math> corresponds to the same level of variation). The <tex-math notation="LaTeX">dw</tex-math> series followed a gradually increasing trend with occlusion time, reaching median [range] <tex-math notation="LaTeX">Rd</tex-math> values of 9.44 [1.01, 80.74] at the occlusion end. <tex-math notation="LaTeX">Rd</tex-math> at occlusion end was significantly higher than threshold values of 1, 2, 5, and 10 in 94.1%, 85.11%, 64.4% and 48.5% of patients, respectively. The spatial lead-wise analysis of <tex-math notation="LaTeX">dw</tex-math> showed distinct distributions depending on the occluded artery, suggesting a relation with the ischemia location. The relative variation <tex-math notation="LaTeX">R</tex-math> with ischemia of index <tex-math notation="LaTeX">dw</tex-math> (9.4) is greater than that of the T-wave amplitude (7.7), <tex-math notation="LaTeX">Tₚₑ</tex-math> interval (2.7) and T-wave width (3.0). In conclusion, <tex-math notation="LaTeX">dw</tex-math> tracks ischemic-induced variations in repolarization dispersion in a more robust manner than classical indexes, avoiding the impact of ST segment elevation/depression or early T-wave distortions, thus warranting further clinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gómez et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Myocardial ischemia (n=101). Acute ischemia induced during percutaneous coronary intervention vs. Pre-intervention control ECG recordings was evaluated on Normalized time-warping index (Rd) of the T-wave peak-to-end interval.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: