Examines the impact of statistical approaches on climate change projections, indicating significant differences in uncertainty.
A Bayesian statistical model developed to produce probabilistic projections of regional climate change using observations and ensembles of general circulation models (GCMs) is applied to evaluate the probability distribution of global mean temperature change under different forcing scenarios. The results are compared to probabilistic projections obtained using optimal fingerprinting techniques that constrain GCM projections by observations. It is found that, due to the different assumptions underlying these statistical approaches, the predicted distributions differ significantly in particular in their uncertainty ranges. Results presented herein demonstrate that probabilistic projections of future climate are strongly dependent on the assumptions of the underlying methodologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: