Key result
Continuous transesophageal echocardiography during transvenous lead extraction detected pulling on the atrial wall in 40.5% of patients and acute tamponade requiring sternotomy in 1.1%.
Why the study?
The usefulness of transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring for transvenous lead extraction procedures remains controversial.
Does continuous TEE monitoring during transvenous lead extraction detect invisible events and prevent dangerous complications?
Observational (n=936)
No
Does continuous TEE monitoring during transvenous lead extraction detect invisible events and prevent dangerous complications?
Continuous TEE during transvenous lead extraction provides real-time detection of dangerous manipulations and complications not visible on fluoroscopy, aiding in procedural safety.
May facilitate early detection of traction risks during lead extraction; leaves open whether routine use improves outcomes.
AIMS: The usefulness of transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) monitoring for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedures is still controversial. The purpose of the current study was to present new TEE values in detecting invisible events in fluoroscopy and preventing the development of dangerous complications. METHODS: From 2015 to 2019, a total of 1026 procedures were performed in single TLE center. In total, 1108 leads had been extracted with a mean lead dwell time of 115.8 ± 77.6 months. Continuous TEE was used in 936 patients with a mean age of 67.1 ± 14.4 years. RESULTS: Preprocedure examination revealed looped leads in 181 (19.3%) patients, dry cardiac perforation in 151 (16.1%), lead-to-lead adhesion in 172 (18.4%), lead adhesion to the myocardium in 317 (33.9%), and vegetations in 119 (12.7%) patients. Intra-procedural TEE demonstrated pulling on the atrial wall, ventricular wall, or tricuspid valve in 380 (40.5%), 235 (25.1%), and 78 (8.3%) patients, respectively. Acute tamponade requiring sternotomy occurred in 11 (1.1%) patients. Migration of vegetation or connective tissue fragments were seen in 69 (7.3%) and 111 (11.8%) patients, respectively. After procedure, TEE was helpful in navigating an implantation, a new lead in 97 (10.3%) patients, and removing the remnants of lead/silicone insulation in 50 (5.3%) patients. CONCLUSION: Real time transesophageal echocardiography for the guidance of transvenous lead extraction informs the operator about the danger of manipulations close to delicate cardiac structures and whether immediate modification to the plan of lead removal is necessary in order to prevent the occurrence of unwanted events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nowosielecka et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Transvenous lead extraction (n=936). Continuous transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated on Detection of invisible events and complications during transvenous lead extraction. Continuous transesophageal echocardiography during transvenous lead extraction detected pulling on the atrial wall in 40.5% of patients and acute tamponade requiring sternotomy in 1.1%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: