Key result
Leadless pacemaker implantation was successful in 98% of patients, with only one in-hospital procedure-related complication (groin hematoma) observed.
Why the study?
Procedural settings, safety measures, and short-term outcomes associated with leadless pacemaker implantation across tertiary European electrophysiology centres needed assessment.
What are the procedural settings, safety measures, and short-term outcomes associated with implantation of leadless pacemakers compared to transvenous pacemakers?
Observational (n=825)
Yes
What are the procedural settings, safety measures, and short-term outcomes associated with implantation of leadless pacemakers compared to transvenous pacemakers?
Leadless pacemaker implantation is highly successful (98%) and associated with a low risk of short-term complications in real-world European practice.
High short-term success with minimal complications supports selective use; extends European real-world data but leaves direct randomized comparisons open.
The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) prospective snapshot survey is to assess procedural settings, safety measures, and short-term outcomes associated with implantation of leadless pacemakers (LLPM), across a broad range of tertiary European electrophysiology centres. An internet-based electronic questionnaire (30 questions) concerning implantation settings, peri-procedural routines, complications, and in-hospital patient outcomes was circulated to centres routinely implanting both LLPMs and transvenous pacemakers (TV-PM). The centres were requested to prospectively include consecutive patients implanted with either LLPMs or TV-PMs during the 10-week enrolment period. Overall, 21 centres from four countries enrolled 825 consecutive patients between November 2018 and January 2019, including 69 (9%) implanted with LLPMs. Leadless pacemakers were implanted mainly under local anaesthesia (69%), by an electrophysiologist (60%), in the electrophysiology laboratory (71%); 95% of patients received prophylactic antibiotics prior to implantation. Most patients on chronic oral anticoagulation were operated on-drug (35%), or during short-term (to 48 h) drug withdrawal (54%). Implantation was successful in 98% of patients and the only in-hospital procedure-related complication was groyne haematoma in one patient. This EHRA snapshot survey provides important insights into LLPM implantation routines and patient outcomes. These findings suggest that despite the unfavourable clinical profile of pacemaker recipients, LLPM implantation is associated with relatively low risk of complications and good short-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lenarczyk et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Pacemaker implantation (n=825). Leadless pacemakers (LLPM) vs. Transvenous pacemakers (TV-PM) was evaluated on Implantation success. Leadless pacemaker implantation was successful in 98% of patients, with only one in-hospital procedure-related complication (groin hematoma) observed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: