Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: Brain surgery remains the only curative treatment for focal refractory epilepsy. Despite ongoing efforts to identify a reliable ”fingerprint” of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), current clinical practice still relies on visual analysis of ictal intracranial EEG signals (stereo-electroencephalography, SEEG). Exploration of alternative approaches is therefore welcomed. Method: We propose a fully automated method based on frequency response function (FRF) estimations to characterize interactions between SEEG contact pairs during ictal periods. Contact pairs are selected using a distance-based strategy within a fixed radius. From FRF estimations and within a relatively low frequency band (1-100 Hz), we extracted features such as phase variance and magnitude characteristics. Then, a logistic regression classifier with soft voting inferred individual contact epileptogenicity from pairwise predictions. Validation was performed on 31 patients rendered seizure-free after surgery (11 from internal dataset, 20 from a public external dataset), using the intersection of visually identified seizure onset zones and surgically treated areas as a proxy for the EZ. Results: Leave-one-subject-out cross-validation yielded 80±22% sensitivity and 79±11% specificity, while cross-dataset validation maintained high sensitivity (82±18%). Clinically, our method offers high-sensitivity screening, capturing 95% of EZ contacts while requiring review of only 58% of all contacts. Conclusions: The proposed method demonstrates encouraging performance in identifying the EZ, with promising generalization capabilities. This new cross-disciplinary approach paves the way for valuable further exploration on larger, more homogeneous cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ricordel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: