Mixed-methods study examines socio-emotional intelligence and practice environment in nurse educators, indicating strong relationships and implications for improvement.
This study examined the socio-emotional intelligence (SEI) and professional practice environment (PPE) of nurse educators in the Bicol Region and determined the relationship between these variables. It also explored nurse educators lived experiences of their professional practice environment and integrated quantitative and qualitative findings to inform a proposed sustainability program. A concurrent–parallel mixed-method design was employed, combining a descriptive correlational evaluative approach with phenomenological inquiry. Quantitative data were gathered through standardized survey instruments measuring SEI and PPE, while qualitative data were obtained through in-depth interviews. Statistical tools were used to examine differences and relationships between variables, and thematic analysis was applied to qualitative responses. Findings revealed that nurse educators demonstrated high levels of socio-emotional intelligence and generally favorable perceptions of their professional practice environment. A significant positive relationship was identified between SEI and PPE, indicating that higher socio-emotional intelligence corresponds to a more supportive and effective work environment. However, participation in institutional affairs and workload and resource adequacy emerged as relatively weaker dimensions of PPE. Qualitative analysis generated four major themes: proactive professional support, a safe and stimulating teachinglearning environment, purpose-driven motivation and well-being, and high-volume workplace challenges. The integration of findings highlights the interplay between individual socio-emotional competencies and organizational conditions in shaping the quality of nursing education. Based on the results, a sustainability program titled “SARABAY” is proposed to strengthen socio-emotional intelligence, enhance participatory governance, improve resource allocation, and support faculty well-being to promote a more effective and sustainable professional practice environment for nurse educators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kevin Hermes Tena (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: