Why the study?
Early identification of new-onset atrial fibrillation is crucial for preventing complications, and left atrial strain parameters may reflect atrial cardiomyopathy and functional abnormalities.
Do left atrial strain parameters predict the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation?
Comparison
Low levels or decreases in left atrial strain parameters vs higher levels
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies
Key result
Low levels of peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) were associated with a nearly 4-fold higher risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (RR 3.95).
Authors
Loading...
May aid early NOAF risk stratification; supports prospective validation before routine clinical adoption.
Meta-Analysis (n=20,681)
Do left atrial strain parameters predict the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation?
Relative Risk: 3.95 (95% CI 1.57–9.92)
p-value: p=0.003
Left atrial strain parameters, particularly PALS and LASr, demonstrate significant predictive and diagnostic value for identifying patients at risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation.
Yang et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) (n=20,681). Low peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) vs. High peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) was evaluated on New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) (RR 3.95, 95% CI 1.57-9.92, p=0.003). Low levels of peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) were associated with a nearly 4-fold higher risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (RR 3.95).