Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative study examines female subjectivity under patriarchal power in Atwood's and Al-Zayyat's works, highlighting cultural nuances.
Present paper compares Margaret Atwood’s dystopian fiction The Handmaid’s Tale (1985) with Latifa Al‑Zayyat’s Egyptian realism fiction, The Open Door (Al-Bab al-Maftooh) (1960). Comparison concentrates on female subjectivity under patriarchal political power. Regardless of difference in genre, language, and historical setting, the two novels question women’s perspectives, political awareness, and social systems that delineate female autonomy. Analysis is based on a feminist comparative methodology of biopolitical theory of Foucault, the postcolonial feminist criticism of Mohanty, narrative voice and authority of Lanser. By juxtaposing literary techniques, thematic concerns (patriarchy, nationalism, sexuality, memory), and styles of resistance, this paper explains the two protagonist’s psychological experiences as sites of political struggle and radical transformation. Additionally, the comparative approach reflects both universality and cultural distinctiveness of women’s reactions to patriarchal control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lujain Yousif Thannoon (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: