Assesses C.A.S.E. mobility readiness in Thailand, suggesting a pathway for sustainable urban transport.
Smart city development depends on the readiness of Connected, Autonomous, Shared, and Electric (C.A.S.E.) mobility systems to deliver sustainable, data-driven urban transportation. This paper assesses C.A.S.E. mobility readiness in Thailand—Southeast Asia’s largest automotive manufacturing economy and an active smart city developer—situating each dimension within Thailand’s national seven-pillar smart city framework. A dual-axis supply–demand positioning framework synthesises peer-reviewed evidence, Thailand-specific infrastructure assessments, consumer surveys, and Monte Carlo simulation outputs across all four dimensions. Electric mobility is the most advanced dimension, with Thailand positioned as a regional production hub; Monte Carlo Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) analysis confirms 23–38% savings per route for electric bus adoption and fleet-wide net savings of approximately 236 million THB over ten years. Shared mobility is constrained by absent Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) governance, though mode choice evidence confirms a 24–36% car trip reduction potential through congestion pricing and shared taxi deployment. Connected mobility occupies a demand-led position; Autonomous mobility remains nascent on road, with trust identified as the dominant adoption barrier in a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) survey of 797 Bangkok residents. Thailand’s seven-pillar smart city framework—particularly the Smart Mobility and Smart Governance pillars—provides the institutional architecture for an integrated C.A.S.E. National Mobility Strategy that could resolve governance fragmentation and accelerate sustainable urban mobility transition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramingwong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: