Mixed-methods study identifies six hazard dimensions for women in construction, suggesting policy reforms.
Women professionals in construction face hazards that extend beyond physical safety risks. However, existing occupational health research remains largely gender-neutral and concentrated in developed contexts, leaving the multidimensional hazard structure under-examined. This study addresses this gap by empirically identifying latent hazard dimensions for women in the Nepalese construction industry. Using a mixed-methods approach, (systematic literature review, expert validation and quantitative survey of 153 respondents), exploratory factor analysis revealed a six-factor hazard structure: gendered workplace culture and discrimination; health and safety challenges; job demands and lack of flexibility; harassment and physical risks; socio-cultural and career barriers; pay and job insecurity. The factors demonstrate strong reliability and validity. Demographic analyses show hazard exposure is socially patterned, with married women, mothers, mid-career professionals, and those in contracting roles reporting higher exposure across specific dimensions. The findings provide a validated hazard structure to inform gender-responsive risk assessment and policy reform in developing construction contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pokhrel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: