Key result
A 12-week exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program for chronic heart failure was cost-effective (incremental cost US$998/QALY), driven by lower yearly hospitalization rates (0.154 vs 0.216).
Why the study?
Is a 12-week exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program cost-effective compared to no rehabilitation in patients with chronic heart failure in Colombia?
Is a 12-week exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program cost-effective compared to no rehabilitation in patients with chronic heart failure in Colombia?
Effect estimate: US$998 per QALY
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is a cost-effective strategy for chronic heart failure patients in Colombia, primarily due to decreased hospitalization rates.
In Brief PURPOSE: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) has met with resistance from third-party payers in low- and middle-income countries because of lack of evidence regarding its cost-effectiveness. We aimed to provide information to help better inform this decision-making process. METHODS: Costs associated with a 12-week exercise-based rehabilitation program in Colombia for patients with CHF were estimated. We collected data on all medical resources used in ambulatory care and data on hospital costs incurred for treating patients with uncompensated CHF. A literature search to establish the hospitalization rates because of uncompensated CHF, death because of CHF, and potential decreases in these data because of the utilization of CR was conducted. We modeled incremental costs and effectiveness over a period of 5 years from the perspective of the third-party payer. RESULTS: All costs were converted from Colombian pesos to US dollars. For an exercise-based CR program of 12-week duration (36 sessions), costs ranged from US$265 to US$369 per patient. Monthly costs associated with ambulatory care of CHF averaged US$128 ± US$321 per patient, and hospitalization costs were US$3621 ± US$5 444 per event. Yearly hospitalization incidence rates with and without CR were 0.154 and 0.216, respectively. The incremental cost of CR would be US$998 per additional quality-adjusted life-year. Sensitivity analysis did not significantly change these results. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac rehabilitation in patients with CHF in settings such as Colombia can be a cost-effective strategy, with minimal incremental costs and better quality of life, mainly because of decreased rates of hospitalization. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with chronic heart failure in Colombia, a low- to middle-income country. Effectiveness was determined from the literature; direct medical costs for treating chronic heart failure and costs of cardiac rehabilitation were locally estimated. Cardiac rehabilitation is a cost-effective strategy, mainly because of decreased rates of hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rincón et al. (2015) studied chronic heart failure. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation vs. No cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Incremental cost per additional quality-adjusted life-year (US$998 per QALY). A 12-week exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program for chronic heart failure was cost-effective (incremental cost US$998/QALY), driven by lower yearly hospitalization rates (0.154 vs 0.216).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: