Key result
Tissue harmonic imaging improved endocardial visualisation in heart failure patients, but contrast added no benefit.
Why the study?
Does tissue harmonic imaging with or without contrast opacification improve endocardial visualisation compared to fundamental imaging in heart failure patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=61)
Does tissue harmonic imaging with or without contrast opacification improve endocardial visualisation compared to fundamental imaging in heart failure patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tissue harmonic imaging improves endocardial visualization in heart failure patients, but the addition of contrast agents may not provide further benefit and depends on the specific wall segment.
AIMS: Wall motion score index (WMSI) is an important prognostic indicator in heart failure (HF) patients but requires endocardial visualisation. This study evaluated the role tissue harmonic imaging (THI) and contrast opacification (LVO) for improving endocardial visualisation and the determination of WMSI in HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one HF patients and 30 controls underwent apical echocardiography with fundamental imaging (FUND), THI and THI with contrast agent (Levovist). Visualisation and motion were graded in the six segments from each of the apical two and four chamber views. Both THI and LVO reduced the percentage of non-visualised segments (FUND 13.6%, THI 5.6%, LVO 2.8%, p=0.01) in the controls, but in HF patients, only THI improved visualisation (% segments not visualised FUND 9.7%, THI 3.5%, LVO 4.8%, p=0.06). The anterior and lateral walls were the least well visualised with FUND, but improved with LVO (anterior p=0.0026, lateral p=0.0003). No improvement was seen in the inferior wall (p=0.30) or septum (p=0.2). WMSI was similar by all methods and negatively correlated with ejection fraction (FUND r=-0.69, THI r=-0.74, LVO r=-0.77, all p<0.001). CONCLUSION: THI improved endocardial visualisation in all subjects and LVO offered additional benefit in the controls, but not in HF patients. Regional endocardial visualisation was inconsistent. Thus, both patient factors and wall segment site need to be considered when using contrast agents for endocardial visualisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whalley et al. (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=61). Tissue harmonic imaging (THI) and contrast opacification (LVO) vs. Fundamental imaging (FUND) was evaluated on Percentage of non-visualised segments in heart failure patients (p=0.06). Tissue harmonic imaging improved endocardial visualisation in heart failure patients, but contrast added no benefit.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: