Key result
Higher social support for exercise was significantly associated with higher vigorous physical activity (β = 0.5, p < .001) and lower sitting time on weekdays and weekends.
Why the study?
This study tested the hypothesized stress-buffering effects of social support on physical activity, sitting time, and blood lipid profiles.
Does social support for exercise improve physical activity, sitting time, and blood lipid profiles in college students?
Cross-Sectional (n=537)
Does social support for exercise improve physical activity, sitting time, and blood lipid profiles in college students?
Effect estimate: β = 0.5
p-value: p=< .001
Fostering social support and reducing stress are associated with increased physical activity and reduced sedentary behavior in college students.
Social support may aid activity promotion in college students; hypothesis-generating for prospective intervention trials on lipids and outcomes.
Objective This study tested the hypothesized stress-buffering effects of social support on physical activity, sitting time, and blood lipid profiles.Participants 537 college students.Methods College students volunteered to self-report stress, social support for exercise, physical activity and sitting time, and provided blood samples to assess lipid profiles in this cross-sectional study.Results Lower stress was associated with higher vigorous physical activity (β = −0.1, t = −2.9, p = .004). Higher social support was associated with higher moderate (β = 0.2, t = 2.0, p = .042), vigorous (β = 0.5, t = 5.4, p < .001), and total (β = 0.1, t = 3.2, p = .001) physical activity, and lower sitting time on weekdays (β = −0.1, t = −3.3, p = .001) and weekends (β = −0.2, t = −3.6, p < .001). Social support moderated the association between stress and sitting time on weekdays.Conclusions Stress reduction and fostering social support may be important strategies for promoting physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviors in college students. Additional strategies are needed to buffer the deleterious effects of stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhuiyan et al. (2020) reported a cross-sectional. Social support for exercise vs. Lower social support was evaluated on Physical activity, sitting time, and blood lipid profiles (β = 0.5, p=< .001). Higher social support for exercise was significantly associated with higher vigorous physical activity (β = 0.5, p < .001) and lower sitting time on weekdays and weekends.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: