Key result
Serial postoperative procalcitonin measurements (AUC 0.750) did not offer an advantage over C-reactive protein (AUC 0.746) for predicting infectious complications after colorectal surgery.
Why the study?
Does perioperative procalcitonin measurement improve early detection of infectious complications compared to C-reactive protein in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery?
Observational (n=79)
Does perioperative procalcitonin measurement improve early detection of infectious complications compared to C-reactive protein in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery?
Serial postoperative procalcitonin measurements do not offer an advantage over CRP measurements for predicting infectious complications following colorectal surgery.
Serial procalcitonin adds no predictive value over CRP after colorectal surgery; leaves open whether biomarker monitoring improves outcomes in prospective trials.
AIM: To assess diagnostic value of perioperative procalcitonin (PCT) levels compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in early detection of infectious complications following colorectal surgery. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 79 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. White blood cell count, CRP, and PCT were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 2, 3, 5, and patients were followed for postoperative complications. Diagnostic accuracy of CRP and PCT values on each day was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, with infectious complications as an outcome measure. ROC curves with the largest area under the curve for each inflammatory marker were compared in order to define the marker with higher diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Twenty nine patients (36.7%) developed infectious complications. CRP and PCT concentrations increased in the early postoperative period, with a significant difference between patients with and without complications at all measured postoperative times. ROC curve analysis showed that CRP concentrations on POD 3 and PCT concentrations on POD 2 had similar predictive values for the development of infectious complications (area under the curve, 0.746 and 0.750, respectively) with the best cut-off values of 99.0 mg/L for CRP and 1.34 μg/L for PCT. Diagnostic accuracy of CRP and PCT was highest on POD 5, however the cut-off values were not considered clinically useful. CONCLUSION: Serial postoperative PCT measurements do not offer an advantage over CRP measurements for prediction of infectious complications following colorectal surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oberhofer et al. (2012) conducted an observational in elective colorectal surgery (n=79). Procalcitonin (PCT) vs. C-reactive protein (CRP) was evaluated on development of infectious complications (AUC 0.750 for PCT vs AUC 0.746 for CRP). Serial postoperative procalcitonin measurements (AUC 0.750) did not offer an advantage over C-reactive protein (AUC 0.746) for predicting infectious complications after colorectal surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: