This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose: The present study aimed to determine the clinical value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels for predicting postoperative infections after hepatectomy. Methods: The medical records of 301 consecutive patients who underwent a hepatectomy were retrospectively reviewed. We divided the patients into a postoperative infectious complication group and a no-infectious complication group. We investigated the changes in perioperative inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and PCT. Then, the associations between infectious complication and the perioperative inflammatory markers were evaluated to identify factors predictive of infectious complications after hepatectomy. Results: Postoperative infectious complications occurred in 67 patients (22.3%). The area under the curve (AUC) using PCT on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 3 was 0.794 and 0.845, respectively, while CRP was 0.493 and 0.641, respectively. PCT had a better AUC than CRP in predicting postoperative infectious complications on POD 1 and 3 ( p <0.001). A multivariate analysis indicated that PCT levels on POD 1 and 3 were independent predictors of infectious complications after hepatectomy ( p = 0.048 and 0.013, respectively). Conclusion: PCT is a better marker for predicting infectious complications than CRP. The PCT levels on POD 1 and 3 after hepatectomy are a valuable indicator of infectious complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mori et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: